25 March 2010
Loan taken by a public company from its director is not treated as public deposit.
If a public company accept loan from its members it would be considered as deposit.
But according to me situation got changed when such director is also a member of the company and the above exemption get lost.
So if a public company accept loan from its director who is also a shareholder it would be considered as public deposit and deposit rules 1975 needs to be complied with.
25 March 2010
I hold a different view. If the loan is taken from a person who is a director at the time when the deposit was taken, then it would not be considered as a deposit, irrespective of the fact that he is also a member.
If I were to think rationally as to why should the law exempt deposits from directors; Might be because they are the people at the helm of the affiars. So if they are also shareholders, even better commitment gets displayed by the director. Whereas deposit from a members who are not directors is as good as deposit from ordinary members of the public and hence should be considered as deposits.