Compliance u/s 117 of the companies act 2013
This query is : Open
28 December 2014
kindly help in clarifying this doubt
Facts:
a) Section 180 places restrictions on Board to exercise certain powers only with the consent of the company by a special resolution, which covers borrowing of money exceeding limits specified. this section is applicable from 12th September 2013,
b) Section 117 Requires certain resolutions to be filled with the ROC, which also includes special resolutions applicable in section 180 of the companies act 2013.Section 117 is applicable from April 2014
Query:
If a Company passes a resolution u/s 180 on 14th September 2013 then is this resolution required to be uploaded with ROC under section 117 ?
My View:
As per my view it is not necessary as date of applicability of section 117 is April 2014 hence resolutions passed prior to April 2014 need not be uploaded
Kindly provide your opinions/veiws
Facts:
a) Section 180 places restrictions on Board to exercise certain powers only with the consent of the company by a special resolution, which covers borrowing of money exceeding limits specified. this section is applicable from 12th September 2013,
b) Section 117 Requires certain resolutions to be filled with the ROC, which also includes special resolutions applicable in section 180 of the companies act 2013.Section 117 is applicable from April 2014
Query:
If a Company passes a resolution u/s 180 on 14th September 2013 then is this resolution required to be uploaded with ROC under section 117 ?
My View:
As per my view it is not necessary as date of applicability of section 117 is April 2014 hence resolutions passed prior to April 2014 need not be uploaded
Kindly provide your opinions/veiws
29 December 2014
Section 117 is notified from 1st April, 2014, there is no requirement for filling the Form MGT-14 for resolution passed on or before 31st March, 2014
Message likes :
2 times
29 December 2014
There is no requirement to file MGT-10 but still you nedd to file e-form 23 at that time to the ROC.
Message likes :
1 times
09 January 2015
Is it mandatory to file form 23. as we have passed this resolution in the month of Sept.and have not yet filled MGT - 14 nor form 23. What would be the penalties and solution for the default.
09 January 2015
Is it mandatory to file form 23. as we have passed this resolution in the month of Sept.and have not yet filled MGT - 14 nor form 23. What would be the penalties and solution for the default.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Applicability
- Is Aadhar PAN linking required for opening bank account?
- Where to show the RCM on Rent paid to unregistered landlord
- CPC Processing IT Return for AY 2023-24 without recognizing the Taxation Option under New Regime
- TDS NUMBER SURRENDER
- Offsetting interest income against derivative trading losses
- Legal heir raised refund , but refund issued to the closed account of deceased.
- Application of 115BAC
- GSTR-3B - Do I file nil when there is no sale but I've bought raw materials
- RCM - commercial rent paid to URP under GST
- Whether still royalty
- 20% OF DEMAND PAYMENT IN APPEAL
- Issue of gst e invoice
- Interchangeable words in accounts
- Adjusted profit/Loss in the case of LLP and Pvt. Ltd.company
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding Resignation by Auditor from Pvt. Ltd.
Trending Online Classes
-
Excel Mastery Program
CA Rishabh Pugalia
CAclubindia
