Capital subsidy received by msme is exempted from income tax
This query is : Resolved
08 August 2018
The capital subsidy which is given by State / Central Govt. is exempted from Income tax on what section under Income Tax Act.
08 August 2018
In the Income Tax Act, there is no direct exemption given to the capital subsidy. From various provisions, we can make out that there would be two cases for capital subsidy.
Option 1) The asset is shown at Actually Incurred Cost
Option 2) The asset is shown at Full Cost including Subsidy amount
E.g.
Asset full cost price Rs.100
Subsidy Rs.40
Incurred Cost Rs.60
Here the tax treatment would be at the discretion of the assessee.
If he opts for Option 1) then depreciation would be charged on Rs.60
If he opts for Option 2) then depreciation would be charged on Rs.100
For further details, please refer following link
http://taxindiaupdates.in/taxation-of-subsidy-under-income-tax-law/
Option 1) The asset is shown at Actually Incurred Cost
Option 2) The asset is shown at Full Cost including Subsidy amount
E.g.
Asset full cost price Rs.100
Subsidy Rs.40
Incurred Cost Rs.60
Here the tax treatment would be at the discretion of the assessee.
If he opts for Option 1) then depreciation would be charged on Rs.60
If he opts for Option 2) then depreciation would be charged on Rs.100
For further details, please refer following link
http://taxindiaupdates.in/taxation-of-subsidy-under-income-tax-law/
08 August 2018
1. Should apply purpose test to decide whether it is a capital receipt (tax free)
or revenue receipt (taxable) per decision in CIT V Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd
(2009) 208 Taxation 59 (SC).
2. Taxability or otherwise of the subsidy would depend on the terms of the scheme
per Mepco Industries Ltd. v CIT (2009) 319 ITR 208 (SC).
1. Should apply purpose test to decide whether it is a capital receipt (tax free)
or revenue receipt (taxable) per decision in CIT V Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd
(2009) 208 Taxation 59 (SC).
2. Taxability or otherwise of the subsidy would depend on the terms of the scheme
per Mepco Industries Ltd. v CIT (2009) 319 ITR 208 (SC).
08 August 2018
If you judge it as a capital subsidy, follow explanation 10 to section 43(1) of the
Income tax Act,1961.
Income tax Act,1961.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Where to show the RCM on Rent paid to unregistered landlord
- CPC Processing IT Return for AY 2023-24 without recognizing the Taxation Option under New Regime
- Applicability
- Is Aadhar PAN linking required for opening bank account?
- Legal heir raised refund , but refund issued to the closed account of deceased.
- TDS NUMBER SURRENDER
- Gst Sales of FY 2023-24
- Offsetting interest income against derivative trading losses
- GSTR-3B - Do I file nil when there is no sale but I've bought raw materials
- RCM - commercial rent paid to URP under GST
- Doubt in Form AOC 4
- Issue of gst e invoice
- Interchangeable words in accounts
- Adjusted profit/Loss in the case of LLP and Pvt. Ltd.company
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding Resignation by Auditor from Pvt. Ltd.
- Regarding einvoice taken on nil rated sales
Trending Online Classes
-
Excel Mastery Program
CA Rishabh Pugalia
CAclubindia
