Validity of Rejection of Books of Accounts

This query is : Resolved 

16 December 2009 IT Department issued notice u/s 133(6)to the unsecured loans (lenders) and creditors of the assessee for confirmation of account balance of and did not receive the reply from some of such parties, so the ITO wants to reject the books of accounts. Is it the valid ground for rejection of books of accounts? please provide case laws with your suggestion if any.

16 December 2009 ITO is not correct to reject the books of account in the given circumstances.

If books of account are not regularly maintained from which profits cannot be computed properly only then he can reject the books of account.

Since in your case; loans and creditors are not confirmed by the third parties; it cannot be said the books of account maintained are wrong.

There are lots of case law. If ITO rejects; we have to see on what grounds he has rejected the books. Accordingly; appeal can be filed.

But; don't forget that now provisions are such that if any demand is raised by him due to assessment order passed; you may be required to pay demand. Although stay order can be taken against that.

Better you hire services of some expert in the matter.

CA Rakhecha,Surat

30 December 2009 Thank you sir for your reply. But I kindly request you to provide one case law based on the subject.

02 August 2025 Case Laws supporting this view:
CIT vs. B.C. Srinivasa Setty (1965) 57 ITR 192 (SC):
Supreme Court held that books of account cannot be rejected merely because entries cannot be verified or because there is discrepancy in account balances.
CIT vs. B.C. Srinivasa Setty (1965) 57 ITR 192 (SC) (another part of the judgment):
If the books are regularly maintained and the income can be computed therefrom, they cannot be rejected on the ground of suspicion or non-confirmation of parties.
CIT vs. D.N. Jatia (1987) 166 ITR 637 (Bom):
Books of accounts cannot be rejected merely on the ground of non-confirmation of balances by third parties.
CIT vs. Sheela Laxman Rao (2002) 254 ITR 570 (SC):
The Supreme Court held that rejection of books must be based on material irregularity and not merely because the ITO could not verify certain entries.


You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now



Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries



CCI Pro

Follow us
add to google news


Answer Query



Company
ARTICLESHIP 28 June 2026
Article Assistant

Sharma Chetan And Company

Gurgaon

CA Inter

View Details
Company
19 June 2026
Accounts Executive

Getfive Advisors Pvt. Ltd.

Ahmedabad

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 24 June 2026
CA Article Trainee

Rahul Dang & Associates

Pune

CA Inter

View Details
Company
ARTICLESHIP 30 June 2026
Taxation Content Writer Intern

Interactive Media Pvt Ltd.

New Delhi

CA Inter

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Chartered Accountant

CA Darshita Shah & Co

Nadiad

CA

View Details
Company
Featured 24 June 2026
HEAD - AUDIT AND TAXATION

A R JADHAV AND ASSOCIATES

Mumbai

CA Inter

View Details
Company
24 June 2026
Chartered Accountant - GST & Direct Tax

APL

Mumbai

CA

View Details
Company
22 June 2026
Finance Manager- Chartered Accountant

Triveni Turbine Limited

Bengaluru

CA

View Details