service tax on " rental of immovable property services'
This query is : Resolved
08 April 2009
Dear friends,
a lessor got regn under ST on 24.03.09 for " rental of immovable property services'and claiming ST from 01.04.2008 ( i.e from FY begining onwards ).
query is;
1.Is it correct charging ST with retrospective effect?
2.Will ST applicalbe on the full value of rent paid?
3.Is ST applicable on arrears of rent also?
4.The property belongs to HUF and rent paid to individual co parceners by separate cheques after TDS.But only one co parcener charging ST out of his share of rent.Is it correct or we have to pay voluntarily to all the owners?
a lessor got regn under ST on 24.03.09 for " rental of immovable property services'and claiming ST from 01.04.2008 ( i.e from FY begining onwards ).
query is;
1.Is it correct charging ST with retrospective effect?
2.Will ST applicalbe on the full value of rent paid?
3.Is ST applicable on arrears of rent also?
4.The property belongs to HUF and rent paid to individual co parceners by separate cheques after TDS.But only one co parcener charging ST out of his share of rent.Is it correct or we have to pay voluntarily to all the owners?
18 April 2009
query is replied as under ;
1.If service has been provided and service tax was not charged, then it is correct charge ST with retrospective effect
2.Yes ST applicalbe on the full value of rent paid
3.Yes ST applicable on arrears of rent also as services were provided during the levy of tax
4.This must be due to the reasons that they all must be falling under the threshold exemption of 10 lacs. If the service provider is not charging the onus is on them to discharge the liability.
By a written arrangement you should state that any liability arising in future due to ignorance of not charging the taxes, the same shall not be paid at a later date.
1.If service has been provided and service tax was not charged, then it is correct charge ST with retrospective effect
2.Yes ST applicalbe on the full value of rent paid
3.Yes ST applicable on arrears of rent also as services were provided during the levy of tax
4.This must be due to the reasons that they all must be falling under the threshold exemption of 10 lacs. If the service provider is not charging the onus is on them to discharge the liability.
By a written arrangement you should state that any liability arising in future due to ignorance of not charging the taxes, the same shall not be paid at a later date.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Should I include march foreign salary received in April in my income for FY 2023-24?
- Tax on capital gains revoked us 54f
- Refund of AY 22-23
- HSN Details in IFF/GSTR-1 & in GSTR 9
- Inventory of finished goods
- TDR receipts for agreement holder
- Sale of property furniture sale
- GST APPLICABILITY ON POLLUTION CHECK SERVICE
- Quiery in relation to GST liability in case of an advocate who has obtained GST registration.
- Company Incorporation - CA and directors signing from different states
- JOB WORK ITC 04
- MODEL FILLED AUDIT REPORT FOR TRUSTS IN FORM 10B
- 115TD on cancellation of 12A 80G Registration
- Point (III) 9 of GSTR-9C
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- CASE INTIMATION OF LIABILITY UNDER SECTION 73(5)(Rule 142(1A)
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
