Section 293 (1) (d)
This query is : Resolved
16 February 2010
Company has passed the resolution under Sec. 293(1)(d) when company was Private Limited Company, now company is converted into Public Limited Company, now what will be effect of said passed resolution under section 293(1)(d)?
As said section was not applicable to private Limited Companies when it was passed, i am confused how to deal with this issue.
As said section was not applicable to private Limited Companies when it was passed, i am confused how to deal with this issue.
16 February 2010
According to me, resolution to borrow funds exceeding the paid up capital and free reserves had been passed when it was pvt. company. At that no involvement of public funds, ownership and management is in the hands of the few people. But now public money is involved, and money borrowwed exceeded the limit of paid up capital and reserves and surplus. So, they should once again pass the resoultion under section 293(1)(d).
Further, by interpreting the section 293(1)(d),it can be concluded that the section 293 does not apply in case of pvt. companies so resolution passed by pvt. company is not valid. Further, the 293 talks about the whole money borrowed including already borrowed or to be borrowed exceeded the limit of paid up capital and reserves and surplus so it needs to pass new resolution in case of conversion.
Further, by interpreting the section 293(1)(d),it can be concluded that the section 293 does not apply in case of pvt. companies so resolution passed by pvt. company is not valid. Further, the 293 talks about the whole money borrowed including already borrowed or to be borrowed exceeded the limit of paid up capital and reserves and surplus so it needs to pass new resolution in case of conversion.
17 February 2010
Section 293(1)(a) to 293(1)(e) is not applicable to private limited company. Hence course of action detailed by Ms. Deepika may be followed.
Message likes :
1 times
17 February 2010
No need to pass new resolution just because of change in status of the co.
Old Resolution is still valid.
Old Resolution is still valid.
Message likes :
1 times
17 February 2010
Thank you Sir,
Is there anything in writing on this, may be some circulars, case laws or any authenticate source.
Is there anything in writing on this, may be some circulars, case laws or any authenticate source.
17 February 2010
Thank you Sir,
Is there anything in writing on this, may be some circulars, case laws or any authenticate source.
Is there anything in writing on this, may be some circulars, case laws or any authenticate source.
17 February 2010
No Sir.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- Inventory of finished goods
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- Quiery in relation to GST liability in case of an advocate who has obtained GST registration.
- Should I report my US salary for January, February, March in Schedule FA?
- GST ON EXPORT COMMISSION
- Sale of property furniture sale
- BUYING PROPERTY COULD NOT FILE 26QB
- Gst input for FY 23-24
- Regarding Waiver of Interest levied u/s 50 of PGST/CGST Act
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
