Section 2(22)(e)
This query is : Resolved
Querist : Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
21 November 2012
AN ITO UNDER SCRUTINY ASSESSEMENT OF A.Y. 2009-08 ADDED DEBIT BALANCE OF 100000/- ON 30/06/2008 OF DIRECTOR LEDGER U/S 2(22)E WHEREAS AS ON 31/03/2009 THE DIRECTOR HAD CREDIT BALANCE.
WHETHER THE ITO IS CORRECT .PLEASE GUIDE WITH SUITABLE CASES.
THANKS IN ADVANCE
WHETHER THE ITO IS CORRECT .PLEASE GUIDE WITH SUITABLE CASES.
THANKS IN ADVANCE
21 November 2012
According to the decision in case of Tarulata Shyam v. CIT [1977] 108 ITR 345 (SC) debit balance even if paid before year end section 2(22)(e) would get attracted.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Manual Rectification through AO
- IT Return filed defective u/s 139 (9)
- Fixed Deposit Claim Relinquishment by the Nominee
- Defective Return - Tds on advance
- Income Type for interest from government bonds
- Not a CA , can we prepare balance sheet
- TCS ON SOFTWARE SALES
- SHARE TRANSFER PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY
- Car Purchases in Daughter Name
- Invoicing in different currency
- ITR 6 Schedule CFL and UD Issues
- Gstr 9 2023-24
- GSTR-9 HSN Summary and Credit Note without item
- Interchangeable words in accounts
- Adjusted profit/Loss in the case of LLP and Pvt. Ltd.company
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- GST RCM not shown in GSTR-3B
Trending Online Classes
-
Landmark Judgments: Important Provisions of the EPF & ESI Act interpreted by the Honorable Supreme Court of India
Mr.Balamurugan Ranganathan15 November 2024
CAclubindia
