Rule 6dd
This query is : Open
06 December 2012
If a company paid rs 2000 each to mtnl on telephone bill of his 20 employee in a single day in cash then section 40A(3) is attract or not.?
please consider rule 6DD exception also...
please consider rule 6DD exception also...
07 December 2012
NOT ATTRACTED.
MTNL has acknowledged this payment from your employees (if bills were on employee's name) and not from Company.
MTNL has acknowledged this payment from your employees (if bills were on employee's name) and not from Company.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Inventory of finished goods
- Can we claim ITC of Feb-2024 in the month of November-2024 which was not claimed by oversight
- Quiery in relation to GST liability in case of an advocate who has obtained GST registration.
- RCM INVOICING FROM NOV-2024
- GST Regis.
- Disallowance of Section 43B(h) to sez units
- REGARDING 25 AS DATE OF PAYMENT AND DATE OF BOOKING
- Tds on building rent monthly
- Clarification on Documentation of Paid-Up Capital Contribution by Directors
- Confusion around Form 26QB fields
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding einvoice taken on nil rated sales
- Strategical investment in Public listed company
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
