Revision of service tax return
This query is : Resolved
01 March 2012
A CONCERN HAS FILED SERVICE TAX RETURN OF APRIL TO SEP 2010 , BUT THE SERVICE TAX AS CALCULATED BY THE CONCERN IS NOT PROPER , THE PAYABLE AMOUNT IS NOW CALCULATED AND IT IS ABOVE WHAT HAS BEEN DEPOSITED AND FILED IN THE RETURN.
I WANT TO KNOW THAT I CAME TO KNOW THIS FACT NOW ON 01.03.2012, AND AFTER APR - SEP-2010 NO RETURN HAS BEEN FILED NOR ANY SERVICE TAX AMOUNT HAS BEEN PAID?
WHATS THE REMEDY AND APPLICABLE PENALTY?
I WANT TO KNOW THAT I CAME TO KNOW THIS FACT NOW ON 01.03.2012, AND AFTER APR - SEP-2010 NO RETURN HAS BEEN FILED NOR ANY SERVICE TAX AMOUNT HAS BEEN PAID?
WHATS THE REMEDY AND APPLICABLE PENALTY?
04 March 2012
Dear Mr. Rathor,
The concern can follow any one course of action out of below two options available:
(I) Belated Filing of return:
1. It attracts LATE FEES of Rs.20,000/-(in your case) in terms of Rule 7-C of ST Rules, 1994.
2. However, in case of NIL Return only, waive/reduction of Late fees can be requested for by an application to CEO with satisfying reasons for not filinf the return.
3. Your belated return will be scrutinized in normal course.
(II) Non - Filing of Return
1. It attracts PENALTY (max. limit upto Rs.10,000/-) in terms of Sec 77 of FA, 1994.
2. Waiver of penalty can be requested for (sec 80 of FA, 1994).
3. It is most likely to lead to "Best Judgement Assesssment" (Sec 72 of FA, 1994)
In my opinion; Option (I) is recommended.
The concern can follow any one course of action out of below two options available:
(I) Belated Filing of return:
1. It attracts LATE FEES of Rs.20,000/-(in your case) in terms of Rule 7-C of ST Rules, 1994.
2. However, in case of NIL Return only, waive/reduction of Late fees can be requested for by an application to CEO with satisfying reasons for not filinf the return.
3. Your belated return will be scrutinized in normal course.
(II) Non - Filing of Return
1. It attracts PENALTY (max. limit upto Rs.10,000/-) in terms of Sec 77 of FA, 1994.
2. Waiver of penalty can be requested for (sec 80 of FA, 1994).
3. It is most likely to lead to "Best Judgement Assesssment" (Sec 72 of FA, 1994)
In my opinion; Option (I) is recommended.
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Is Aadhar PAN linking required for opening bank account?
- Applicability
- CPC Processing IT Return for AY 2023-24 without recognizing the Taxation Option under New Regime
- Where to show the RCM on Rent paid to unregistered landlord
- RCM - commercial rent paid to URP under GST
- TDS NUMBER SURRENDER
- GSTR-3B - Do I file nil when there is no sale but I've bought raw materials
- Legal heir raised refund , but refund issued to the closed account of deceased.
- Gst Sales of FY 2023-24
- Offsetting interest income against derivative trading losses
- My Last working day in current org is in novemebr 2024 but they are asking me to submit IT proof
- Indexation benefit applicability
- SEC 54 OF IT ACT
- Passed group 2 exams under wrong gender
- REQUIREMENT OF 15CB
- QUERY FOR RCM ON RENT
- APPEAL-CIT
- Payable outstanding for years disallowance
- Whether still royalty
- Issue of gst e invoice
Trending Online Classes
-
Excel Mastery Program
CA Rishabh Pugalia
CAclubindia
