17 April 2014
If mr A intends to gift some amount
either to his stepmother. Will they
be included in the definition of
relative? Will such amount be
exempted for the purpose of tax
calculation?
17 April 2014
i dont think there is any requirement for mother to die. the act only requires that the said woman should be married to your father - "spouse of lineal ascendent"
17 April 2014
please don't confuse between lineal ascendent and spouse of lineal ascendent.
even if assume that the the father divorced the first wife and then remarried, then the first wife is covered as lineal ascendent (mother) and second wife covered as spouse of lineal ascendent (step mother).
17 April 2014
What theory u r clarifying is like a utopia. I didn't heard anything like that. If a person has taken divorce then is there any relation between them?? It is really.......
17 April 2014
Sir. Since when divorce has ended relation between mother and the kid? Seems u live in uptopian world where divorces dont take place. and you not hearing it only suggest that you live in a pretty narrow world!
17 April 2014
What I am talking is the correct interpretation of tax laws...as it is written and as it is intended! you are free to offer an alternative interpretation of section 56 if possible. You may please consider definition of relative:
(v) any lineal ascendant or descendant of the individual; ie mother
(vii) spouse of the person referred to in clauses (ii) to (vi);] (ie wife of father including step mother)
Also, since in India Uniform Civil Code is not practiced, suggesting that only one wife can be included shall be against Muslim religion. Which shall be against our constitutional rights.
18 April 2014
Sandeep...lolzzz...I purchased from flea market! if you feel Flea markets are also out of this world, please refer oxford dictionary...but then may be oxford itself is out of world...lolz.
also please understand its an utopia not a utopia..using wrong grammar is not good for such a senior expert as you are!
18 April 2014
I dont understand, what u wana say with the same spelling of the word utopia. Plz first set ur mind then reply for a query. If u r not set then how could u help others. I really have a soft corner for u.
you are yet to counter the definition under 56(2). and if you didn't understand difference between "an utopia" and "a utopia", then I cannot help.
I hope you read the Income-tax Act, 1961, Section 56(2). And you can prescribe me medicines - but given that your tax knowledge is so primal, I would not trust you on medical front!
18 April 2014
yes. but any interpretation of section 56 SIR. I am waiting for your expert opinion. Can you counter my interpretation on 56 other than usage of words like "a utopia", "out of this world", "get well soon" etc etc. looks like a philosophy class instead of taxation. well anyways, take care...
18 April 2014
Ya I didn't need to interpret u. Even I do not measure u, that I interpret u. And the grammar classes r started by u n not me. The word "lol" is also invented by u in this conversation n not me. So God bless u n provide u peace. Take Care Sir.
18 April 2014
sir lol was not invented but introduced by me in this conversation. actually lol was not invented by anyone! sorry for the grammar class but giving you tax class was equally useless. but cannot help as I purchased from flea market and you most probably from ICAI...so respect :)
18 April 2014
Thanks dear friend (Ohh again its me, Expert). But if u r providing grammar classes like this i m sure u will reach ur goal. And ICAI will appoint u for grammar education of their staffs, gatekeeper etc. And that's I telling u that it is useless for u to teach me. Coz, u must gain knowledge fist n then teach others.
18 April 2014
Agreed with the Views of Nikhil ji and Chackrapaniji. Gift to step mother is covered under the definition of Relative so its exempt from Tax.
18 April 2014
Dear Sir (Chakrapani Ji) & Vinita Ji
I m also saying the same thing that gift to or from step mother is exempted. There is no confusion in it.
But suppose a person has 5 wives (possible in Mohammedan case)then the gift from or to all the mothers r exempted??
And leave that example, Suppose a divorce has been taken place, so now there is no relation between the couples, then how the gift from the divorcee(to his/her child) is exempted? Plz explain.
disregarding the earlier acrimony, this is the answer:
the divorced mother/father shall still be included as lineal ascendant...the son/daughter shall continue be included in lineal descendant.
Marriage or no marriage. Even a person born out of wedlock shall be included in the relatives as lineal descendant.
So lets say a person divorces his wife and remarries, the divorced wife shall continue to be included as lineal ascendent and step mother shall be included as spouse of lineal ascendent.
Marriage itself is not a mandatory condition. So divorce not gonna change anything anyways.
18 April 2014
Dear Nikhil, as per this it is illegal child(as per wedlock) so how can this b a relative? I m not commenting on ur reply. But me really confused. Coz I have dealt with the above case n the IT officials guided us in the manner I replied above. Thats y I was so aggressive in my view.
18 April 2014
I understand friend.. the logic is simple..Income tax act doesnt comment upon the illegality or legality of the relationship.
If you look at the wordings of Section 56, it is clear that lineal ascendant or descendent is to be considered as a relatives. it doesn't require marriage between the father and the mother. As long as you are able to prove the father/motherhood, the lineal ascendency/descendancy is established.
And you cannot depend on IT officials' view for any matter. if the intention of the law is to give benefits/taxation only on the basis of marriage, it prescribes so under various sections section 64 (clubbing of income).
As far 56 is concerned, such condition has not been provided.
18 April 2014
Ya I know what sec 56 says. But I was replying on the basis of as guided by the IT Commissioner(CIT). K I m leaving it accepting it according to Sec.56.
And plz forget all the above acrimony. I didn't personally say all this to u.