Rectification of GSTR1
This query is : Resolved
25 February 2022
I filed my GSTR1 in F/Y (April 2020 to March 2021), but made a mistake in B to B as GST number of Receipent was wrong ( Gst number of A instead of B). Now I want to correct it with in this month(Feb 2022).
The invoices raised were correct, but reported in wrong GSTN in GSTR1
Kindly advise:
1. Is it allowed to correct the mistake now in month of Feb 2022 (Qtr Jan - March 2022) I am a quarterly filer. If not, what is the alternative choice?
2. Step by step procedure to rectify and report in GSTR1 of current quarter.
The invoices raised were correct, but reported in wrong GSTN in GSTR1
Kindly advise:
1. Is it allowed to correct the mistake now in month of Feb 2022 (Qtr Jan - March 2022) I am a quarterly filer. If not, what is the alternative choice?
2. Step by step procedure to rectify and report in GSTR1 of current quarter.
25 February 2022
1 The time allowed for such correction is GSTR filing due date of September 2021 return.
Now it's not possible for any correction.
Now it's not possible for any correction.
25 February 2022
Revised reply.
We are pleased to share recent judgement of the Bombay High Court. The petitioner made inadvertent errors in GSTR-1 form wherein GSTN number of the recipient of goods was mentioned incorrectly. Leading to denial of credit to the recipient. Time limit for rectification expired. Supplier made representations, however, remained unanswered. The Hon’ble High Court directed to consider the request of the assessee in light of the ruling of the Madras High court in Pentacle Plant Machineries Pvt. Ltd. v/s. GST Council Secretariat - 2021-TIOL-604-HC-MAD-GST and Sun Dye Chem v/s. Assistant Commissioner - 2020-TIOL-1858-HC-MADGST. It may assist similarly placed litigants.
We are pleased to share recent judgement of the Bombay High Court. The petitioner made inadvertent errors in GSTR-1 form wherein GSTN number of the recipient of goods was mentioned incorrectly. Leading to denial of credit to the recipient. Time limit for rectification expired. Supplier made representations, however, remained unanswered. The Hon’ble High Court directed to consider the request of the assessee in light of the ruling of the Madras High court in Pentacle Plant Machineries Pvt. Ltd. v/s. GST Council Secretariat - 2021-TIOL-604-HC-MAD-GST and Sun Dye Chem v/s. Assistant Commissioner - 2020-TIOL-1858-HC-MADGST. It may assist similarly placed litigants.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Refund of AY 22-23
- HSN Details in IFF/GSTR-1 & in GSTR 9
- Should I include march foreign salary received in April in my income for FY 2023-24?
- Tax on capital gains revoked us 54f
- TDR receipts for agreement holder
- Inventory of finished goods
- Applicability of Ind As to associate of associate
- Clarification on Documentation of Paid-Up Capital Contribution by Directors
- Disallowance of Section 43B(h) to sez units
- GST APPLICABILITY ON POLLUTION CHECK SERVICE
- Refund AY 2012-13 and 2013-14
- DIRECT TAX CODE 2025
- MODEL FILLED AUDIT REPORT FOR TRUSTS IN FORM 10B
- 115TD on cancellation of 12A 80G Registration
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- CASE INTIMATION OF LIABILITY UNDER SECTION 73(5)(Rule 142(1A)
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
