19 September 2015
Disallowance of expenditure per se will not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars meaning thereby penalty cannot be imposed.
Citation:- CIT Vs. Reliance Petroproducts P Ltd (2010) 322 ITR 158(SC).
19 September 2015
Income tax department has been INSTRUCTED to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) adn come what may, every Assessing Officer is scrupulously following the same. (By default)
We need to contest this on the grounds 01. inaccurate particulars 02. wilful 03. cooperated during the course of proceedings