Penalty u/s 271(1)(b)
This query is : Resolved
08 February 2015
My Client serve with notice u/s 142(1), asking for All Bank detail and Bank Statement for the period 01.04.2007 to 31.03.2008 along with bank summary.
Now my client do not have such detail.
My question is
1) Whether Failure to furnish such document will be liable for penalty u/s 271(1)(b)?
2) Whether AO is justified in calling for such old detail? If yes then is there any remedy to waive such demand?
3) Assessee is Salried Employee so he is not under any obligation to maintain any books or account and document. So how can he produce bank detail of such long period?
Now my client do not have such detail.
My question is
1) Whether Failure to furnish such document will be liable for penalty u/s 271(1)(b)?
2) Whether AO is justified in calling for such old detail? If yes then is there any remedy to waive such demand?
3) Assessee is Salried Employee so he is not under any obligation to maintain any books or account and document. So how can he produce bank detail of such long period?
08 February 2015
01. Yes. It very much will attract 271 (1)
02. Just ensure with A.O. if he has taken prior permission of his higher authority. (Do this tactfully. There is every likelyhood that A.O. has done this and the entire gamut might boomerang....)
03. Please dont waste your time in asking LOGICAL question to yourself like how can he produce bank detail of such long period.? You need to show that in spite of doing genuine effort, bank is NOT able to give the details. Let bank say so....you dont have to say...ok?
Being CA, I am sure you agree the importance of THIRD party evidence.
Your views please.
02. Just ensure with A.O. if he has taken prior permission of his higher authority. (Do this tactfully. There is every likelyhood that A.O. has done this and the entire gamut might boomerang....)
03. Please dont waste your time in asking LOGICAL question to yourself like how can he produce bank detail of such long period.? You need to show that in spite of doing genuine effort, bank is NOT able to give the details. Let bank say so....you dont have to say...ok?
Being CA, I am sure you agree the importance of THIRD party evidence.
Your views please.
08 February 2015
Yup agreed with your advise totally. Thanks
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- REGARDING GST ON COMMERICIAL PROPERTY
- 15ca /15cb whose income tax login? remitter or nri seller's login?
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- Regarding Documentation & Compliances for Opening of Unit of Pvt Ltd.
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- TDS U/S. 194NF
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- Tds on building rent monthly
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- VERIFICATION OF REFUND RELATED
- GST Regis.
- ITC c/f from FY2022-23 to FY2023-24 entered the same in table 8C of GSTR9 of FY 2022-23, in FY23-24
- Late filling fees Demand by gst office
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Short and Excess provision of expenses
- Issue of gst e invoice
- Interchangeable words in accounts
- Adjusted profit/Loss in the case of LLP and Pvt. Ltd.company
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
