Payment Allowable or Not
This query is : Resolved
28 May 2010
Dear Experts, an opinion is required on the following matter.
A businessmen involved in the business of arranging the transportation of cotton bales from the seller’s place of business to buyer’s place of business. He is being engaged by the buyer. His duty is to arrange the lorry and dispatch the goods to the buyer’s premises. He receives the cheques/drafts from the buyer and he disburses the payment to the transporter in cash. He also received the TDS Certificate from the buyer party u/s 194C i.e contract payment.
That means the amount received will be considered as his own receipts and the payment by him to the transport agency will be considered as his own expense.
Total amount received from the buyer by cheque or draft during the year exceeds Rs. 75 lakhs. He has made majority of the payments in cash and has not deducted any TDS on the motor lorry freight paid for the whole year (F.Y.2009-10). I think he’s liable for audit but as far as the payments in cash are concerned, are these payments to be allowed as being incurred in cash and in excess of Rs. 20,000/-? Will the auditor give any qualification regarding the payment in cash.? Will it create any other impact as he is liable for audit? What would have been the position if he would not have been subject to audit? Kindly suggest your views.
A businessmen involved in the business of arranging the transportation of cotton bales from the seller’s place of business to buyer’s place of business. He is being engaged by the buyer. His duty is to arrange the lorry and dispatch the goods to the buyer’s premises. He receives the cheques/drafts from the buyer and he disburses the payment to the transporter in cash. He also received the TDS Certificate from the buyer party u/s 194C i.e contract payment.
That means the amount received will be considered as his own receipts and the payment by him to the transport agency will be considered as his own expense.
Total amount received from the buyer by cheque or draft during the year exceeds Rs. 75 lakhs. He has made majority of the payments in cash and has not deducted any TDS on the motor lorry freight paid for the whole year (F.Y.2009-10). I think he’s liable for audit but as far as the payments in cash are concerned, are these payments to be allowed as being incurred in cash and in excess of Rs. 20,000/-? Will the auditor give any qualification regarding the payment in cash.? Will it create any other impact as he is liable for audit? What would have been the position if he would not have been subject to audit? Kindly suggest your views.
28 May 2010
Yes, He will be liable for Tax audit.
Payment made agianst single bill on same day exceeding Rs. 20000 will be disallowed.
Yes, Position will be differ if he would not have been subject to audit, then it will be depend on luck i.e If case came under scrunity then ITO may demand something or add it in income.
Payment made agianst single bill on same day exceeding Rs. 20000 will be disallowed.
Yes, Position will be differ if he would not have been subject to audit, then it will be depend on luck i.e If case came under scrunity then ITO may demand something or add it in income.
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Refund of AY 22-23
- HSN Details in IFF/GSTR-1 & in GSTR 9
- Should I include march foreign salary received in April in my income for FY 2023-24?
- Tax on capital gains revoked us 54f
- TDR receipts for agreement holder
- Inventory of finished goods
- Applicability of Ind As to associate of associate
- Clarification on Documentation of Paid-Up Capital Contribution by Directors
- Disallowance of Section 43B(h) to sez units
- GST APPLICABILITY ON POLLUTION CHECK SERVICE
- Refund AY 2012-13 and 2013-14
- DIRECT TAX CODE 2025
- MODEL FILLED AUDIT REPORT FOR TRUSTS IN FORM 10B
- 115TD on cancellation of 12A 80G Registration
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- CASE INTIMATION OF LIABILITY UNDER SECTION 73(5)(Rule 142(1A)
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
