Double taxation and computation of tax
This query is : Resolved
23 February 2016
Dear Experts,
In the F. Y 2008-09 I was a research Fellow in Kyoto, Japan for three months and my income from this was Rs. 756514/-. Against this I had paid Rs. 151303/- TDS @20% in Japan. And taxable income from my regular salary in India during the F.Y 2008-09 was Rs.288179/- Can anybody help me to compute my tax liability correctly corresponding to the Double Taxation treaty between India and Japan. Is there a special rate that is applicable in this case?
I shall be grateful.
Thanks
Ajithprasad
M. S. University Baroda
In the F. Y 2008-09 I was a research Fellow in Kyoto, Japan for three months and my income from this was Rs. 756514/-. Against this I had paid Rs. 151303/- TDS @20% in Japan. And taxable income from my regular salary in India during the F.Y 2008-09 was Rs.288179/- Can anybody help me to compute my tax liability correctly corresponding to the Double Taxation treaty between India and Japan. Is there a special rate that is applicable in this case?
I shall be grateful.
Thanks
Ajithprasad
M. S. University Baroda
23 February 2016
Work out the total tax payable in India including the Japan income and deduct the TDS made in Japan that is the tax payable in India.
23 February 2016
Dear seetharaman fy 08-09 return cannot be filled. Time limit for filling return is one year from the end of relevant ay
24 February 2016
Dear Seetharaman,
Thanks for your suggestion. The IT office suggested a flat rate of 18.5% which I am not able to understand. Wonder how do they arrive at that rate.
My case is a resubmission of the returns which has not been settled for all these years.
Thanks for your suggestion. The IT office suggested a flat rate of 18.5% which I am not able to understand. Wonder how do they arrive at that rate.
My case is a resubmission of the returns which has not been settled for all these years.
24 February 2016
Dear Mr. Sharma,
This is a case of resubmission of returns which is not settle so far.
This is a case of resubmission of returns which is not settle so far.
24 February 2016
Did they àllowed relief only for Rs. 139955(18.5% on 756514).They should have allowed relief for Rs.151303 such average working not required in your case.
Message likes :
1 times
24 February 2016
Thanks and your reply is very useful.
Yes, the IT officer's view that is the rate applicable in my case. I am filing a reply tomorrow in which I will hold my ground and claim full of relief. What is the rationale for the 18.5% rate? who will fall in that category?
Yes, the IT officer's view that is the rate applicable in my case. I am filing a reply tomorrow in which I will hold my ground and claim full of relief. What is the rationale for the 18.5% rate? who will fall in that category?
25 February 2016
They have applied the average rate which is not applicable in your case.
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Tax on capital gains revoked us 54f
- Should I include march foreign salary received in April in my income for FY 2023-24?
- Refund of AY 22-23
- HSN Details in IFF/GSTR-1 & in GSTR 9
- Inventory of finished goods
- TDR receipts for agreement holder
- Confusion around Form 26QB fields
- Sale of property furniture sale
- Quiery in relation to GST liability in case of an advocate who has obtained GST registration.
- Clarification on Documentation of Paid-Up Capital Contribution by Directors
- Refund AY 2012-13 and 2013-14
- DIRECT TAX CODE 2025
- MODEL FILLED AUDIT REPORT FOR TRUSTS IN FORM 10B
- 115TD on cancellation of 12A 80G Registration
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- CASE INTIMATION OF LIABILITY UNDER SECTION 73(5)(Rule 142(1A)
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
