Directors
This query is : Resolved
13 November 2008
K is a private limited company. Its shareholders are ABC- 50 percent shares and XYZ- 50 percent shares. NOw ABC has appointed 2 directors on the Board and XYZ has appointed 3 directors on the Board. Due to the composition of the BOD K Co. becomes subsidiary of XYZ, which is a listed company. Is there any way out by not changing the composition / shreholding pattern remove K from being the subsidiary of XYZ.
Ist opition is that can one director be given only casting vote at the time of meeting so that the decission taken at the meeting cannot be favoured for one company. Is it necessary to give directors voting rights.. Kindly guide.... urgent...
Ist opition is that can one director be given only casting vote at the time of meeting so that the decission taken at the meeting cannot be favoured for one company. Is it necessary to give directors voting rights.. Kindly guide.... urgent...
13 November 2008
I think both are holding company because both are able to control compostion of BOD of K Ltd.
It is of no matter that ABC has appt 2 & XYZ has appt 3.
Main is that both are able to control BOD.
It is of no matter that ABC has appt 2 & XYZ has appt 3.
Main is that both are able to control BOD.
13 November 2008
On what basis both are holding company. they only hold 50-50 percent of shares... the XYZ has three directors on Board and it can control the composotion of BOD, as per section 4 of the companies act, 1956..
13 November 2008
If U have more directors, it does not mean that U can control the board.
13 November 2008
Section 4:
(2) For the purposes of sub-section (1), the composition of a company's Board of directors shall be deemed to be controlled by another company if, but only if, that other company by the exercise of some power exercisable by it at its discretion without the consent or concurrence of any other person, can appoint or remove the holders of all or a majority of the directorships; but for the purposes of this provision that other company shall be deemed to have power to appoint to a directorship with respect to which any of the following conditions is satisfied, that is to say:-
(a) that a person cannot be appointed thereto without the exercise in his favour by that other company of such a power as aforesaid;
(b) that a person's appointment thereto follows necessarily from his appointment as director 2[***] or manager of, or to any other office or employment in, that other company; or
3[(c) that the directorship is held by an individual nominated by that other company or a subsidiary thereof.]
It means both ABC & XTYZ can have power to appoint even if they do not exercise it.
(2) For the purposes of sub-section (1), the composition of a company's Board of directors shall be deemed to be controlled by another company if, but only if, that other company by the exercise of some power exercisable by it at its discretion without the consent or concurrence of any other person, can appoint or remove the holders of all or a majority of the directorships; but for the purposes of this provision that other company shall be deemed to have power to appoint to a directorship with respect to which any of the following conditions is satisfied, that is to say:-
(a) that a person cannot be appointed thereto without the exercise in his favour by that other company of such a power as aforesaid;
(b) that a person's appointment thereto follows necessarily from his appointment as director 2[***] or manager of, or to any other office or employment in, that other company; or
3[(c) that the directorship is held by an individual nominated by that other company or a subsidiary thereof.]
It means both ABC & XTYZ can have power to appoint even if they do not exercise it.
13 November 2008
not very clear
13 November 2008
Dekho abhi ABC & XYZ donno 50% pe hai.
It means both have power to appoint their director on board of K.
So by virtue of section 4(2) given above, both are holding company of K limited.
Ye important nahi hai ki who is exercising the power for being holding co....
Clear ?
It means both have power to appoint their director on board of K.
So by virtue of section 4(2) given above, both are holding company of K limited.
Ye important nahi hai ki who is exercising the power for being holding co....
Clear ?
13 November 2008
In case of decision to be taken by Board and there is 50- 50 voting, then what has to be done..
13 November 2008
Since both are able to take dicision on composition of BOD, both are controlling BOD.
So both are Holding Co.
So both are Holding Co.
13 November 2008
Ok
13 November 2008
Actually neither of ABC or XYZ is a holding company, individually, unless one of them has the absolute power to control the composition of the Board of K Ltd. You have to see also the shareholding agreement if any between these companies as also whether that agreement has been incorporated in AOA.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- 15ca /15cb whose income tax login? remitter or nri seller's login?
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- Regarding Documentation & Compliances for Opening of Unit of Pvt Ltd.
- TDS U/S. 194NF
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- RCM INVOICING FROM NOV-2024
- Import license renewal
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding einvoice taken on nil rated sales
- Strategical investment in Public listed company
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
