capitalisation of exp
This query is : Resolved
08 August 2008
the exchange rate differece relating to foreign currency liability incurred in relation to fixed assets.
1.what is the treatment of above transaction as per co.act
2.wat is its treatment as per IT act.is it an allowable exp.
1.what is the treatment of above transaction as per co.act
2.wat is its treatment as per IT act.is it an allowable exp.
08 August 2008
Companies Act goes by accounting standards.
Income tax is for capitalisation.
The treatment as per should be to capitalise upto the time of acquisition, thereafter charge to p&l.
Income tax is for capitalisation.
The treatment as per should be to capitalise upto the time of acquisition, thereafter charge to p&l.
08 August 2008
schedule VI says it should b taken to carrying amt of fixed asset. But AS 11 Revised 2003 says it should b charged to P&L Account which is mandatory in nature. but as AS 11 is in conflict with law as schdule VI has not yet revised in this case auditor will not qualify his report for not complying with AS 11.
and as per income tax act section 43A it shall be taken to carrying amount of F.asset hence to b capitalised
and as per income tax act section 43A it shall be taken to carrying amount of F.asset hence to b capitalised
08 August 2008
AS-11 issued under Companies accounting standard rules, 2006 says method prescribed in the standard should be followed irrespective of the treatment suggested in Schedule VI of the companies act. Hence, it should be expensed.
(Companies like Reliance, Airtel went on capitalising and reported that if such exchange difference was taken to P&L their profits would have come down by so many crores. Refer "The Business Line" - 06.08.08(Front Page))
So the treatment is it should be expensed. But they have questioned the validity of the standard.
Under Income Tax Act, Sec 43A should be followed and remember, that section talks only about the payment and not the mere restatement.
(Companies like Reliance, Airtel went on capitalising and reported that if such exchange difference was taken to P&L their profits would have come down by so many crores. Refer "The Business Line" - 06.08.08(Front Page))
So the treatment is it should be expensed. But they have questioned the validity of the standard.
Under Income Tax Act, Sec 43A should be followed and remember, that section talks only about the payment and not the mere restatement.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Applicability
- Is Aadhar PAN linking required for opening bank account?
- Where to show the RCM on Rent paid to unregistered landlord
- CPC Processing IT Return for AY 2023-24 without recognizing the Taxation Option under New Regime
- Application of 115BAC
- RCM - commercial rent paid to URP under GST
- Offsetting interest income against derivative trading losses
- TDS NUMBER SURRENDER
- GSTR-3B - Do I file nil when there is no sale but I've bought raw materials
- Legal heir raised refund , but refund issued to the closed account of deceased.
- Whether still royalty
- 20% OF DEMAND PAYMENT IN APPEAL
- Issue of gst e invoice
- Interchangeable words in accounts
- Adjusted profit/Loss in the case of LLP and Pvt. Ltd.company
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding Resignation by Auditor from Pvt. Ltd.
Trending Online Classes
-
Excel Mastery Program
CA Rishabh Pugalia
CAclubindia
