Capital gain tax liability on auction sale
This query is : Resolved
02 July 2014
dear experts,
Mr. A (managing director of a company) mortgage his house as guarantee to bank against loan of Rs. 11 crore.
on non payment of outstanding loan bank auctioned Mr. A house and realised Rs. 7.5 Crore
now please tell what is the tax liability of Mr. A?
in Sale agreement Seller is Bank and Purchaser deducted and deposited the TDS in Mr. A account.?
please suggest how to determine tax liability
Mr. A (managing director of a company) mortgage his house as guarantee to bank against loan of Rs. 11 crore.
on non payment of outstanding loan bank auctioned Mr. A house and realised Rs. 7.5 Crore
now please tell what is the tax liability of Mr. A?
in Sale agreement Seller is Bank and Purchaser deducted and deposited the TDS in Mr. A account.?
please suggest how to determine tax liability
05 July 2014
Tax Liability of Mr. A is as under:
Full Value of Consideration Rs. 7.5 Crore
Less: Cost/Indexed Cost of Acq. xx
STCG OR LTCG
Less: Tax Deducted at source
Full Value of Consideration Rs. 7.5 Crore
Less: Cost/Indexed Cost of Acq. xx
STCG OR LTCG
Less: Tax Deducted at source
Message likes :
1 times
05 July 2014
sir but in above case Mr.A (guarantor) didn't receive anything as a consideration?
please clarify
please clarify
05 July 2014
Though the Mr. A was only guarantor, he was undisputed owner of the property while creating the mortgage in the favor of the bank. Hence, mere for non receipt of sale consideration Mr.A can not escape from the capital Gain Tax.
In CIT Vs. Roshanbabu Mohammed Hussein Merchant,Bombay High Court rejected the contention of the Assessee for claiming CG Tax arising on sale of Land exempt from LTCG.
In CIT Vs. Roshanbabu Mohammed Hussein Merchant,Bombay High Court rejected the contention of the Assessee for claiming CG Tax arising on sale of Land exempt from LTCG.
07 July 2014
sir but there are delhi high court and kerala high court decisions in the same case that in case of guarantor there was no sales consideration received by the guarantor (neither in money nor by any reduction in liability)therefore there's no capital gain tax liability..
sir isn't it very harsh for assessee, in the above case assessee didn't receive even a single penny and as per bombay high court judgement cited by you assesse have to pay near about Rs. 1.2 crore capital gain tax.
sir isn't it very harsh for assessee, in the above case assessee didn't receive even a single penny and as per bombay high court judgement cited by you assesse have to pay near about Rs. 1.2 crore capital gain tax.
08 July 2014
It may possible that, two different courts may announce a different verdicts on alike case matters.Sometimes High courts may refer the past case verdicts on similar subject or sometimes may study the entire case again for reaching the final conclusion and courts have their own discretion to study the case and announce the verdicts and therefore these decisions may vary.
Secondly, Could not have Guarantor paid the Capital Gain Tax, if he had sold the same property instead of Bank? Guarantor has not received single pie because he has entered in the legal agreement and he was aware of the fact that he may not get anything if the bank sells the property on being failure of borrower for repayment of obligations.
Third and important, he was a undisputed owner of the property at the time of entering into such agreement. Mere standing as a guarantor and not receiving of money does not change this fact.
Finally, It is not necessary that amount should be actually received for being taxed it may be received or receivable as per the definition U/S 48
Yes, it was very harsh for the assessee as the amount was huge and unfortunately there is no such provision in the which exempts the capital gain tax in such cases except in reverse mortgage.
Secondly, Could not have Guarantor paid the Capital Gain Tax, if he had sold the same property instead of Bank? Guarantor has not received single pie because he has entered in the legal agreement and he was aware of the fact that he may not get anything if the bank sells the property on being failure of borrower for repayment of obligations.
Third and important, he was a undisputed owner of the property at the time of entering into such agreement. Mere standing as a guarantor and not receiving of money does not change this fact.
Finally, It is not necessary that amount should be actually received for being taxed it may be received or receivable as per the definition U/S 48
Yes, it was very harsh for the assessee as the amount was huge and unfortunately there is no such provision in the which exempts the capital gain tax in such cases except in reverse mortgage.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- REGARDING GST ON COMMERICIAL PROPERTY
- 15ca /15cb whose income tax login? remitter or nri seller's login?
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- TDS U/S. 194NF
- Regarding Documentation & Compliances for Opening of Unit of Pvt Ltd.
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- Capital gain consideration
- VERIFICATION OF REFUND RELATED
- GST Regis.
- ITC c/f from FY2022-23 to FY2023-24 entered the same in table 8C of GSTR9 of FY 2022-23, in FY23-24
- Late filling fees Demand by gst office
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Short and Excess provision of expenses
- Issue of gst e invoice
- Interchangeable words in accounts
- Adjusted profit/Loss in the case of LLP and Pvt. Ltd.company
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
