Sir,
Dealer e-waybill generated required four invoices each one below rs:50,000/- single day.

clarification regarding the potential inclusion of "(Registered)" in our GST trade name, specifically to align with Section 59(2) of the Partnership Act 1932, which stipulates that "The firm, which is registered, shall use the brackets and word (Registered) immediately after its name," for invoicing compliance.
Our partnership firm is in the process of registration with the Registrar of Firms. We are considering the inclusion of "(Registered)" immediately after our firm's name in our GST trade name to comply with Section 59(2) of the Partnership Act 1932, ensuring our invoicing practices meet the legal requirements.Importantly, upon completion, the registration certificate issued by the Registrar of Firms is expected to reflect our original firm name without the "(Registered)" suffix.
It's essential to note that the legal name in our PAN details would not change and remains aligned with the original firm name submitted during the registration process.This inquiry seeks guidance on the feasibility and process of including "(Registered)" in our GST trade name exclusively for issuing compliant invoices as per Section 59(2) of the Partnership Act 1932, while maintaining consistency with our legal name based on PAN details.

Dear Sir,
A person need to pay 18% gst instead of 12% paid with 3b and R1 of March 2023. Whether it can be paid by drc 03 ? and which head to be select while filing drc 03.

Please clarify.

Sir,
Input credit limitation rule 16 along with rule 37 in cgst act

Received a demand of Rs. 3,53,000/-(Tax + Interest+Penalty) U/S.16(4) against March,2019 GSTR . Is there any remedy sir ?

SIR, ITC AVAILABLE UNDER IGST, BUT I HAVE CLAIMED BY MISTAKE IN CGST AND SGST IN 3B. HOW CAN I RECTIFY IN GST9

Sir
Case open u/s 73 for FY-2018-19. Officer disallowing ITC claimed GST-3B by recipient in Mar-2019 and other conditions satisfied as per sec-16 ,on the ground
That supplier has filed GST-1 LATE In the month of Sep-20 .
Invoices although appearing in GST-2A of FY-2018-19 and supplier also filed GST-3B
Kindly advise
1.Is officer right in disallowing ITC and under which clause of Sec 16 he can do so.
Thanks

Whether the case of nine bench judges of Apex Court with regards to royalty is in the nature of tax or not can referred in grounds of appeal for the GST appeal in case of gst not paid on royalty ?

whether GST is applicable on sale of jaggery by a manufacturer who cover under HSN code 17011410.

Dear Sir,
One of my client has received Assessment Demand Order under Section 73 of CGST Act in GST DRC-07 on dated 28/07/2023 against which we had filed Rectification Application within 3 months time under section 161 of CGST Act to rectify the errors made on dated 02/09/2023. However the officer has rejected application and passed Order for rejection of Rectification on dated 28/11/2023 keeping the demand order of DRC-07 unchanged. Now we wish to file appeal against the Order passed of Rectification within 3 months time limit. However while filing appeal on Portal we found both the Orders reflecting on portal, the Order of DRC-07 is shown under Assessment Demand Order and latter order is shown under Assessment Non Demand Order. If I select the first order then they shown there is delay in filing of appeal however if I select Latter order i.e. Rectification Rejection Order, in that there is no demand reflecting so I am unable to pay 10% of Demand as per Section 107 of CGST Act. What has to be done?

Logically we are following the act & rules in right terms. However Please guide whether we are correct and also help me with any Instructions or Circular or Notification or Case study available for aforesaid same situation.