anurita
05 April 2008 at 19:48

income tax returns

i want to file for income tax returns.im not a salaried person, but self employed.so i keep getting cheques,but all my cheques have a tds cut.so pls help what do i do?


M.Sathish Kumar
05 April 2008 at 19:19

Loan Repayment

Hello Sir,

One of my client taken a loan from ICICI bank Rs 500000/- and they are under an obligation to repay the same on monthly basis.

Can You please explain the legal requirement as per section 269SS and 269T of Income Tax Act 1961?


Thanks in Advance!!!


harishkumar
05 April 2008 at 18:41

implicationvat

if a manufacturing concern is using its own product for extracting another product does vat apply to them


CA Suresh Paghdar
05 April 2008 at 17:17

SECTION 10B - EOU

WHETHER A UNIT ORIGINALLY FORMED AS EOU IN F.Y.2003-2004 CAN AVAIL DEDUCTION UP TO F.Y.2009-2010 ?


Madhushree
05 April 2008 at 17:13

TDS on VAT/WCT

If I have raised bill for electroplating to a customer in which I have not specifically charged VAT but charged service tax & VAT on the net amount, is it correct to deduct tax at soucre?


Ashish Ranpara
05 April 2008 at 16:20

Accounting Treatment and Income Tax

Hi Friends,

I have one Queery for Shares Account

If a person doing Share Business in a Single code and also give the bill to his client whether it is an acceptable in point of view income tax and accounting? What dificulties will be face for doing so?


Shyam Sarda
05 April 2008 at 15:26

TDS U/S 194I applicability

XYZ PVT. LTD. HAS ENTERED INTO AN LEASE AGREEMENT WITH ABC.LEASE PERIOD 60MONTHS(2lacs*60).EVEN IF THE LESSEE WANTS TO TERMINATE IN BETWEEN CO HAS TO PAY RENT FOR BAL LEASE PERIOD. AFTER 12 MONTHS XYZ LTD WISHES TO TERMINATE THE AGREEMNT.THUS WAS BINDING TO PAY THE LEASE RENT FOR BAL PERIOD OF 48 MONTHS(2lacs * 48).AFTER NEGOTIATING THE LESSOR AGREED TO TERMINATE THE AGREEMENT WITHOUT CHARGING ANY PENAL RENT FOR BAL LEASE PERIOD PROVIDED THE CO. WILL NOT BE COMPENSATED FOR THE FURNITURE WORK DONE(60 lacs) AND THE DEPOSIT(5lacs) WILL NOT BE REFUNDED.
QUERRY:-
1.UNDER WHICH PROV OF THE IT ACT THE ASSET CAN BE DELETED FROM THE BLOCK?THERE ARE OTHER ASSETS IN THE BLOCK.
2.IS THE TRANSACTION LIABLE FOR TDS?IF YES, A) What should be the amount?(penal rent or book value + depoit)B) Under which section 194I or 194C?


Rahul Suresh Jinde
05 April 2008 at 12:07

Vat on Petrol

What is the vat % on petrol? Give details.
Awaiting your valuable guidence.


K V Subba Rao
05 April 2008 at 11:12

Agreement not to affect TDS u/s 194-C

In a Contract between “Payer” (a small Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956) and “Payee” (a large PSU established under a Central Act), the nature of work is such that payment has to be made after affecting TDS u/s 194-C in the normal course. The Agreement entered into between the two parties, contained a specific Clause requiring the “Payer” Company not to affect TDS. This Clause did not adversely affect the interest of the “Payer” Company so far because the “Payee” Corporation has been every year obtaining Certificate u/s 197 from its (Payee) Assessing Officer not to deduct tax since the objective of “Payee” Corporation was held long ago to be of charitable nature and hence exempted from Income Tax.

In the Finance Bill 2008, it is proposed to restrict the scope of charitable purpose (Refer Pages 1634 and 1646 of Apr 08 issue of the Chartered Accountant). So the “Payee” Corporation would henceforth lose the Tax Exemption status hitherto being enjoyed and become liable to pay Income Tax like any other Company involved in commercial activity.

Now that the “Payee” Corporation has become liable to pay Income Tax from FY 2008-09 onwards, it would not obviously be able to hereafter obtain Certificate u/s 197 from its (Payee) Assessing Officer not to deduct tax. So the “Payer” Company has to affect TDS u/s 194-C before making payments to the “Payee” Corporation; else the entire expenditure becomes inadmissible in its (“Payer” Company) assessment.

Please provide references to any Case Law or Departmental Circulars on this point to enable the “Payer” Company to convince the “Payee” Corporation that it is not fair to impose such condition.


Samir
04 April 2008 at 20:12

Salary structure

Hi,

We are paying 50000/- per month as director remuneration to MD.Can you suggest salary structure to reduce tax burden.