BCTT withdrawn
This query is : Resolved
01 March 2008
why bctt withdrawn \?
was it making any sense when it was introduced?
was it making any sense when it was introduced?
01 March 2008
The Banking Cash Transaction Tax (BCTT) was introduced for the purpose of enlarging the information system of the Income Tax Department.
But now since the information is also being gathered through other instruments introduced in the last few years, BCCT is withdrawn.
But now since the information is also being gathered through other instruments introduced in the last few years, BCCT is withdrawn.
01 March 2008
A GOOD QUESTION INDEED.
WHEN BCCT WAS INTRODUCED INITIALLY , EVEN INDIVIDUALS WERE MADE TO PAY.
LATER ON PUBLIC UPROAR, THE GOVT. WITH DREW ON INDIVIDUALS AND RETAINED FOR CURRENT ACCOUNT WITHDRAWALS.
THE BASIC OBJECTIVE OF THE TAX WHEN INTRODUCED WAS TO STEM AND UNEARTH BLACK MONEY.
BUT BY WITHDRAWING THE SAME FROM 01-04-2009, I DONT KNOW WHAT KIND OF MESSAGE THE GOVT . IS SENDING TO THE NATION.
ANY WAY IN AN ELECTION YEAR , THE GOVT. CANNOT AFFORD TO IGNORE CORPORATE PRESSURES.
THE OTHER ANALOGY IS THAT WHATEVER COLLECTIONS SO FAR MADE MAY BE A PITTANCE COMPARED TO THE COST OF THE EFFORT AND BANKS MAY HAVE COMPLAINED OF THE SAME.
ANOTHER SERIOUS ISSUE IS UP TO WHAT EXTENT GOVT. ACHIEVED THE OBJECTIVE IN THE SHORT PERIOD OF 2/3 YEARS AND HOW MUCH BLAK MONEY WAS UNEARTHED OR WHAT ARE THE CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS FROM THESE COLLECTIONS SO FAR.
I FEEL THE GOVT. HAS NO ANSWERS FOR THESE QUESTIONS. TO AVOID ANSWERS EVEN FOR THE FUTURE, THE BCCT MAY HAVE BEEN WITH DRAWN.
ANOTHER ANGLE TO THE WHOLE ISSUE IS THAT IT IS THE FINANCE MINISTRY WHICH HAS PROPOSED THIS AS A TAX COLLECTION MEASURE
AND THEY ARE THE ONLY ONE NOW TO ANSWER ABOUT THE RESULTS.
THE FINANCE MINISTRY WAS THE JUDGE WHILE IMPOSING BCCT. NOW THE SAME MINISTRY HAS BECOME THE IMPLEMENTER ( BANKING COMES UNDER FINANCE MINISTRY).NOWHERE IN THE WORLD THE SAME PERSON OR INSTITUTION CAN BE MADE AS JUDGE ALSO AND IMPLEMENTER ALSO AND NOW VICTIM ALSO.
IT COULD BE TO AVOID THIS UNPLEASANT POSITION PERHAPS THE MINISTRY BACKTRACKED NOW.
R.V.RAO
WHEN BCCT WAS INTRODUCED INITIALLY , EVEN INDIVIDUALS WERE MADE TO PAY.
LATER ON PUBLIC UPROAR, THE GOVT. WITH DREW ON INDIVIDUALS AND RETAINED FOR CURRENT ACCOUNT WITHDRAWALS.
THE BASIC OBJECTIVE OF THE TAX WHEN INTRODUCED WAS TO STEM AND UNEARTH BLACK MONEY.
BUT BY WITHDRAWING THE SAME FROM 01-04-2009, I DONT KNOW WHAT KIND OF MESSAGE THE GOVT . IS SENDING TO THE NATION.
ANY WAY IN AN ELECTION YEAR , THE GOVT. CANNOT AFFORD TO IGNORE CORPORATE PRESSURES.
THE OTHER ANALOGY IS THAT WHATEVER COLLECTIONS SO FAR MADE MAY BE A PITTANCE COMPARED TO THE COST OF THE EFFORT AND BANKS MAY HAVE COMPLAINED OF THE SAME.
ANOTHER SERIOUS ISSUE IS UP TO WHAT EXTENT GOVT. ACHIEVED THE OBJECTIVE IN THE SHORT PERIOD OF 2/3 YEARS AND HOW MUCH BLAK MONEY WAS UNEARTHED OR WHAT ARE THE CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS FROM THESE COLLECTIONS SO FAR.
I FEEL THE GOVT. HAS NO ANSWERS FOR THESE QUESTIONS. TO AVOID ANSWERS EVEN FOR THE FUTURE, THE BCCT MAY HAVE BEEN WITH DRAWN.
ANOTHER ANGLE TO THE WHOLE ISSUE IS THAT IT IS THE FINANCE MINISTRY WHICH HAS PROPOSED THIS AS A TAX COLLECTION MEASURE
AND THEY ARE THE ONLY ONE NOW TO ANSWER ABOUT THE RESULTS.
THE FINANCE MINISTRY WAS THE JUDGE WHILE IMPOSING BCCT. NOW THE SAME MINISTRY HAS BECOME THE IMPLEMENTER ( BANKING COMES UNDER FINANCE MINISTRY).NOWHERE IN THE WORLD THE SAME PERSON OR INSTITUTION CAN BE MADE AS JUDGE ALSO AND IMPLEMENTER ALSO AND NOW VICTIM ALSO.
IT COULD BE TO AVOID THIS UNPLEASANT POSITION PERHAPS THE MINISTRY BACKTRACKED NOW.
R.V.RAO
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Inventory of finished goods
- Confusion around Form 26QB fields
- Can we claim ITC of Feb-2024 in the month of November-2024 which was not claimed by oversight
- Clarification on Documentation of Paid-Up Capital Contribution by Directors
- REGARDING 25 AS DATE OF PAYMENT AND DATE OF BOOKING
- Disallowance of Section 43B(h) to sez units
- RCM INVOICING FROM NOV-2024
- Tds on building rent monthly
- GST Regis.
- Sale of property furniture sale
- Is correct way to find out capital of individual on 31st March
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding einvoice taken on nil rated sales
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
