Application of c form in case
This query is : Resolved
23 July 2018
Dear Sir
Final product manufactured by Assessee is exempt from VAT & CST.
Department argued that government is losing revenue if assessee applies for C Form.
This is because at the time of purchase of material against C Form assessee pays 2% CST whereas after the same material uses in manufacture of Final product , assessee do not pay any tax since it is exempt.
Had assessee purchases the same material from the state it would have paid 14.5% VAT. Thus there is loss of revenue of 12.5%.
Hence , assessee cannot apply C Form.
Is the view of the Department correct.
Final product manufactured by Assessee is exempt from VAT & CST.
Department argued that government is losing revenue if assessee applies for C Form.
This is because at the time of purchase of material against C Form assessee pays 2% CST whereas after the same material uses in manufacture of Final product , assessee do not pay any tax since it is exempt.
Had assessee purchases the same material from the state it would have paid 14.5% VAT. Thus there is loss of revenue of 12.5%.
Hence , assessee cannot apply C Form.
Is the view of the Department correct.
23 July 2018
Can anyone please guide
12 July 2024
The view of the Department regarding the applicability of C Form in your scenario appears to be based on their interpretation of revenue loss due to the differential tax rates (2% CST under C Form vs. 14.5% VAT if purchased within the state). Let's break down the key considerations:
### Understanding the Situation:
1. **Exemption from VAT & CST on Final Product**:
- The final product manufactured by the assessee is exempt from VAT and CST. This means that no VAT or CST is levied on the sale of this final product.
2. **Purchase of Raw Materials Against C Form**:
- Assessee purchases raw materials against C Form, which allows for a concessional rate of 2% CST instead of the higher local VAT rate (14.5% in this case).
3. **Revenue Loss Argument**:
- The Department's argument is that if the assessee uses C Form to purchase raw materials at 2% CST and then manufactures an exempt final product, it results in a significant revenue loss for the government.
- They argue that had the assessee purchased the same materials locally, they would have paid 14.5% VAT, resulting in higher revenue for the government.
### Analysis:
1. **Legal Provisions and Intent of C Form**:
- C Form is intended to facilitate interstate trade by allowing a concessional rate of CST for purchases made against it. It is meant to promote commerce and reduce tax cascading.
- The assessee is within their rights to avail of C Form benefits if the transactions meet the conditions prescribed under the CST Act.
2. **Exemption on Final Product**:
- Exemption of the final product from VAT and CST does not automatically disqualify the assessee from applying C Form for raw material purchases. The exemption on the final product does not affect the applicability of C Form on inputs.
3. **Revenue Implications**:
- While the Department's concern about potential revenue loss is valid from a revenue collection perspective, the applicability of C Form is governed by the CST Act and its rules. If the assessee complies with the conditions for issuing C Forms (such as interstate movement of goods for use in manufacturing), they are entitled to use C Forms for purchases.
### Conclusion:
- **Department's View vs. Legal Right**: The Department's view on revenue loss is a policy argument, but legally, if the assessee meets the conditions for C Form issuance under the CST Act, they can apply for and use C Forms for interstate purchases.
- **Compliance**: It's crucial for the assessee to ensure that they comply with all legal requirements and conditions for using C Forms, including maintaining proper documentation and adhering to the purpose for which C Forms are issued.
Therefore, while the Department's concern about revenue loss is understandable, the legal right of the assessee to apply for and use C Form for interstate purchases, as long as they meet the prescribed conditions, stands valid under the CST Act.
### Understanding the Situation:
1. **Exemption from VAT & CST on Final Product**:
- The final product manufactured by the assessee is exempt from VAT and CST. This means that no VAT or CST is levied on the sale of this final product.
2. **Purchase of Raw Materials Against C Form**:
- Assessee purchases raw materials against C Form, which allows for a concessional rate of 2% CST instead of the higher local VAT rate (14.5% in this case).
3. **Revenue Loss Argument**:
- The Department's argument is that if the assessee uses C Form to purchase raw materials at 2% CST and then manufactures an exempt final product, it results in a significant revenue loss for the government.
- They argue that had the assessee purchased the same materials locally, they would have paid 14.5% VAT, resulting in higher revenue for the government.
### Analysis:
1. **Legal Provisions and Intent of C Form**:
- C Form is intended to facilitate interstate trade by allowing a concessional rate of CST for purchases made against it. It is meant to promote commerce and reduce tax cascading.
- The assessee is within their rights to avail of C Form benefits if the transactions meet the conditions prescribed under the CST Act.
2. **Exemption on Final Product**:
- Exemption of the final product from VAT and CST does not automatically disqualify the assessee from applying C Form for raw material purchases. The exemption on the final product does not affect the applicability of C Form on inputs.
3. **Revenue Implications**:
- While the Department's concern about potential revenue loss is valid from a revenue collection perspective, the applicability of C Form is governed by the CST Act and its rules. If the assessee complies with the conditions for issuing C Forms (such as interstate movement of goods for use in manufacturing), they are entitled to use C Forms for purchases.
### Conclusion:
- **Department's View vs. Legal Right**: The Department's view on revenue loss is a policy argument, but legally, if the assessee meets the conditions for C Form issuance under the CST Act, they can apply for and use C Forms for interstate purchases.
- **Compliance**: It's crucial for the assessee to ensure that they comply with all legal requirements and conditions for using C Forms, including maintaining proper documentation and adhering to the purpose for which C Forms are issued.
Therefore, while the Department's concern about revenue loss is understandable, the legal right of the assessee to apply for and use C Form for interstate purchases, as long as they meet the prescribed conditions, stands valid under the CST Act.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Inventory of finished goods
- Clarification on Documentation of Paid-Up Capital Contribution by Directors
- Tds on building rent monthly
- Applicability of Ind As to associate of associate
- REGARDING 25 AS DATE OF PAYMENT AND DATE OF BOOKING
- Disallowance of Section 43B(h) to sez units
- Sale of property furniture sale
- RCM INVOICING FROM NOV-2024
- Confusion around Form 26QB fields
- GST Regis.
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding einvoice taken on nil rated sales
- Strategical investment in Public listed company
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
