Share Capital
This query is : Resolved
02 June 2008
A Company already doing business has increased its authorised Capital.
The Expenses incurred for the same has been taken as prelimenary expenses. Is the treatment right?
The Expenses incurred for the same has been taken as prelimenary expenses. Is the treatment right?
02 June 2008
Hi..
Share Issue expenses and expenses on increasing authorised Share
Capital, being a capital expenditure, should be shown under Misc Expenditure and should be amortised over a period of ten years
Share Issue expenses and expenses on increasing authorised Share
Capital, being a capital expenditure, should be shown under Misc Expenditure and should be amortised over a period of ten years
05 June 2008
Increase in share capital is completely dissallowed as per IT act..
05 June 2008
Expenses relating to increase in share Capital. . . And an u please mention the section that increase in share capital is disallowed by the IT Act . .
Thanking You
Thanking You
21 August 2008
No since the company is already in business therefore exp. incurred on increaseing Auth. cap ican not be treated as Preliminary expenses.
19 November 2008
i request all of you to please mention the case citation as my assessment is pending
11 December 2009
Fees paid to the Registrar of Companies for increasing Authorised Capital will result in an advantage of enduring nature and is a Capital Exp. [Case Law- Punjab State Industrial Developement Corporation Ltd V/s CIT (1997) 225 ITR 792/93 Taxman 5 (SC)].
However u/s 35D(2)(c)(iii) of the Act,only fees paid for registration of the Company is deductible.Fees paid for increase in share capital is not fees for registration of the Company,and hence it is not amortisable under this provision-Case law CIT v/s Hindustan Insecticides Ltd.[2001] 250 ITR 338 (Delhi)
Rgds,
Vaibhav/Gautam
RGD & Co.
However u/s 35D(2)(c)(iii) of the Act,only fees paid for registration of the Company is deductible.Fees paid for increase in share capital is not fees for registration of the Company,and hence it is not amortisable under this provision-Case law CIT v/s Hindustan Insecticides Ltd.[2001] 250 ITR 338 (Delhi)
Rgds,
Vaibhav/Gautam
RGD & Co.
16 August 2010
Why cant we claim that the expense is for the wholly and exclusive purpose of business?
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- 15ca /15cb whose income tax login? remitter or nri seller's login?
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- TDS U/S. 194NF
- Regarding Documentation & Compliances for Opening of Unit of Pvt Ltd.
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- RCM INVOICING FROM NOV-2024
- Import license renewal
- How to determine cost of acquisition of shares on De-merger or Merger
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding einvoice taken on nil rated sales
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
