Section 295
This query is : Resolved
udit sharma
(Querist)
30 November 2010
Hi...
A company ABC Ltd. has 3 Directors A,B,and C. Now, Mr.D is a relative of Mr. A.If we propose to give a loan to Mr.D then the provisions of section 295 have to be complied with.
XYZ Ltd. is a holding company of ABC Ltd. Mr. R is a relative of Mr. X who is a Director in XYZ Ltd. If Mr. R apporaches the Company ABC Ltd. for a loan of Rs.50 Crores, then whether provisions of section 295 ofthe Act are applicable?
To summarise, whether the provisions of section 295 get attracted and will have to be complied with in case the Company proposes to give a loan to a person who is a relative of a Director of its Holding Company??????? Pl. clarify its urgent???????
A company ABC Ltd. has 3 Directors A,B,and C. Now, Mr.D is a relative of Mr. A.If we propose to give a loan to Mr.D then the provisions of section 295 have to be complied with.
XYZ Ltd. is a holding company of ABC Ltd. Mr. R is a relative of Mr. X who is a Director in XYZ Ltd. If Mr. R apporaches the Company ABC Ltd. for a loan of Rs.50 Crores, then whether provisions of section 295 ofthe Act are applicable?
To summarise, whether the provisions of section 295 get attracted and will have to be complied with in case the Company proposes to give a loan to a person who is a relative of a Director of its Holding Company??????? Pl. clarify its urgent???????
Ankur Garg
(Expert)
30 November 2010
Hi,
It is not possible to give loan to Mr. R without CG's approval bcoz section 295 is applicable in the given case. As per my interpretation of section 295(1)(a) this clause includes the following persons:
1. Director of Lending company
2. Director of Lending company's Holding company
Both the above 2 comes under the word "such" being used in clause (a) of section 295(1).
3. Any partner or ralative of such director.
So your case is falling under point 3 above. Mr. R is relative of such director covered under point 2 above.
Thank you
It is not possible to give loan to Mr. R without CG's approval bcoz section 295 is applicable in the given case. As per my interpretation of section 295(1)(a) this clause includes the following persons:
1. Director of Lending company
2. Director of Lending company's Holding company
Both the above 2 comes under the word "such" being used in clause (a) of section 295(1).
3. Any partner or ralative of such director.
So your case is falling under point 3 above. Mr. R is relative of such director covered under point 2 above.
Thank you
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Depreciation Chart Companies Act
- GST Audit whether Govt Companies are exempt?
- PTRC Show Cause Notice on Email
- Accounting treatment of AMC alongwith the purchase of Laptop
- Unable to File TDS Q2 Return – New TRACES Portal Error
- Transfer of Physical Stock Between Two Proprietorship Concerns
- MSME disclosure and disallowance
- Issuing of delivery challan by seller of goods
- Not ordinarily resident having partnership income in India and salary in USA is any form to filed be
- EPF ECR NEW RULES Sep 17th 2026
- GST Treatment of Purchases with GST Paid where Outward Supplies of Manufactured CattleFeed Exempt
- Expert Help Required for TDS Refund 100000 Through TRACES – AY 2022–23
- IMPORT PURCHASE ENTRY PASSED IN BOOKS OF ACCOUNT
- FAST DS 26 Undisclosed Foreign Asset Disclosure Scheme 2026
- Regime change
- Goods sold but invoice not issued
- Tally: Imported bank entries do not show up in manual reconciliation
- Sales of goods of amount Rs97 lakhs to a party
- Confused About My Career After 12th — Cyber Security, AI or Finance? Need Guidance
- FAST-DS 2026 Under Tax Law - No recourse or support for person declaring via this scheme?
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani
Subscribe to Pro
Join an elite circle of professionals
CAclubindia
