06 April 2009
I understand the institute is trying to frame rules to streamline dummy articles. What has astounded me is the stunted & inconsiderate decision taken on transfers. I say this on following accounts:
1) According to the ICAI rules Industrial training can only be taken in the last 12 months. By stressing on barring transfers in the last 12 months the institute has conflicted its own rule.The new rule is vague regarding industrial training.
2) By restricting Students to one principal the institute is trying to freeze out a persons basic human right of freedom.Even if i don't transfer right now the fact that i don't have a choice is very unfair and crippling. There could be various reasons wherein i don't want to continue with a firm. * Quality of work * Management, Seniors and work culture * Better opportunities elsewhere. * Exploitation by Principal * The Institute must understand that the rule will be a tool in the hands of the principal who are already overburdening the students. 3) The institute cannot overnight bring changes with such major implications. They must be sensitive and understand it is a students career in question here. Had these rules be dotted out right from the beginning students would weigh their decisions but imposing them in the middle of the curriculum is despotic abuse of authority. 4) The institute is vague in implementation of the rule. No time frame is mentioned and Nothing is mentioned about the transfers in process/ or about cases wherein students have already put in their papers.
5) Also the institute only formulates rules restricting behavior of students. Late night shifts and working more than the hours prescribed is not unusual. The institute should come up with more stringent action against perpetrators. At the cost of being loud in a public forum i think that this rule is formulated with the interest of principals in question and gives them absolute power to further exploit, the already overburdened students. In my opinion the rule regarding transfers is ridiculous and the student community must raise a voice against this and make sure that this unmerited law is not imposed on us. In this regard i want to know from our experts what course of action can be taken by us .. Appeal ? Redressal , Court case to ensure that such behavior is not doled out to us.
07 April 2009
The rules are framed by the experienced memebers after considering all pros and cons and for the benefit of the student community as whole. The rule is not created for one single student.
INSTITUTE IS NOT CURTAILING STUDENTS FREEDOM BUT MISUSE IN THE NAME OF FREEDOM IS FREEZED NOW.
There clear cut idea for the principal to train his articles clerk. There are so many ca's who do take articled clercks at all.
There is no exploitation by the principal. When you have to learn you have to spend some time. The CA cannot finalise balance sheet as per the convience of the articled clerk. It is for the benefit of the articled clerk he himself has to spend time and learn the things.
Instead of aruguing with the institue try to gain by the rules the institute rules should be given importance. That is an governing body.
Neither extraordinary powers are given to prinicplals nor students rights are curtialed throught the restrictions of the transfer.
CAclubindia
