failure to appoint wholetime director u/s 269
This query is : Resolved
29 August 2010
what is the consequences of failure of a public limited company covered by sec 269 of the companies act, if whole time director or managing director is not appointed?
03 September 2010
Sir,
Liable to penalty u/s. 629 of the Companies Act, 1956.
Liable to penalty u/s. 629 of the Companies Act, 1956.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Manual Rectification through AO
- IT Return filed defective u/s 139 (9)
- Number of Nominees
- Defective Return - Tds on advance
- Fixed Deposit Claim Relinquishment by the Nominee
- Not a CA , can we prepare balance sheet
- Are there any exceptions for residence in Nepal under FEMA/ITA
- Income Type for interest from government bonds
- TCS ON SOFTWARE SALES
- PTRC Challan
- Gstr 9 2023-24
- GSTR-9 HSN Summary and Credit Note without item
- Interchangeable words in accounts
- Adjusted profit/Loss in the case of LLP and Pvt. Ltd.company
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- GST RCM not shown in GSTR-3B
- Bill from Dispatched from issue.
Trending Online Classes
-
Landmark Judgments: Important Provisions of the EPF & ESI Act interpreted by the Honorable Supreme Court of India
Mr.Balamurugan Ranganathan15 November 2024
CAclubindia
