05 April 2011
Here is a case. Kindly help me out. Company-A is a holding compny having shares of its subsidiary Company- B. Co. A gives Interest free loan to Co. B. will this attract deemed dividend as per section 2(22)(e). after a couple of years Co. B repays the same loan to Co. A. will this amount to deemed dividend. Note: No interest is charged during these years.
05 April 2011
No both the transaction will not attract deemed dividend as the company receiving loan should hold more than 10% and not the granting person.
Also loan received from 100% subisidiary company is outside the net of deemed dividend.
06 April 2011
Section 2(22)(e) applies to (e) any payment by a company, not being a company in which the public are substantially interested,
18) “company in which the public are substantially interested”—a com-pany is said to be a company in which the public65 are substantially interested— [(b) if it is a company which is not a 73private company as defined in the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), and the conditions specified either in item (A) or in item (B) are fulfilled, namely :— [(B) shares in the company (not being shares entitled to a fixed rate of dividend whether with or without a further right to participate in profits) carrying not less than fifty per cent of the voting power have been allotted unconditionally to, or acquired unconditionally by, and were throughout the relevant previous year beneficially held by— (c) any company to which this clause applies or any subsidiary company of such company 75[if the whole of the share capital of such subsidiary company has been held by the parent company or by its nominees throughout the previous year.]
Querist :
Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
11 December 2011
sir, I dont think tht a loan from 100% subsidiary is out of the net of deemed dividend. pls clarify if possible
13 December 2011
First of all in case where company B gives loan to company A then deemed dividend will be applicable and not in vice versa. So loan must be given to a shareholder holding more than 10% which is not the case here.