clarification on announcement Bos/announcement/pe2/2008
This query is : Resolved
26 August 2008
1. the announcement used word have exhousted.
Should it be have not exhousted?
2. if the last attempt falls in nov08, can the student again appear in the may09 attempt, as per the announcement,inspite of exhousting all attempts?
3.does "all the students" mean that there is only one condition to satisfy i.e. being a PE2 student, for appearing in both the exams of nov08 and may09?
Should it be have not exhousted?
2. if the last attempt falls in nov08, can the student again appear in the may09 attempt, as per the announcement,inspite of exhousting all attempts?
3.does "all the students" mean that there is only one condition to satisfy i.e. being a PE2 student, for appearing in both the exams of nov08 and may09?
27 August 2008
In order to mitigate the hardship being faced by the students who were registered for Professional Education (Course-II) after passing Professional Education (Examination-I) / Foundation Examination / Entrance Examination as the case may be and have exhausted five consecutive attempts (after having been eligible for admission to the said examination), the Council of the Institute has further decided to hold two more Professional Education (Examination-II) in November, 2008 and May, 2009 as well
AND
Candidates who are registered for Professional Education (Course-II) after passing Professional Education (Examination-I) / Foundation Examination / Entrance Examination as the case may be and have not yet exhausted five consecutive attempts (after having been eligible for admission to the said examination).
please explain me why are there different wording in these annoucements- have exausted and have not exausted- and if it is not by mistake please give me some example to understand it perfectly
AND
Candidates who are registered for Professional Education (Course-II) after passing Professional Education (Examination-I) / Foundation Examination / Entrance Examination as the case may be and have not yet exhausted five consecutive attempts (after having been eligible for admission to the said examination).
please explain me why are there different wording in these annoucements- have exausted and have not exausted- and if it is not by mistake please give me some example to understand it perfectly
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- Inventory of finished goods
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- Tds on building rent monthly
- GST ON EXPORT COMMISSION
- REGARDING 25 AS DATE OF PAYMENT AND DATE OF BOOKING
- Can we claim ITC of Feb-2024 in the month of November-2024 which was not claimed by oversight
- Sale of property furniture sale
- Confusion around Form 26QB fields
- Adjustment entry in the case of Individual and HUF on 31st March
- Stock difference tax applicable on composite rate or normal rate
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
