brought forward loss or unabsorbed depreciation
This query is : Resolved
22 June 2011
What do we mean when we say 'brought forward loss or unabsorbed depreciation as per books of account' ?
Is it the same thing and amount as we calculate in the Income Tax reutrn computations?
For example- if the loss is more than 8 years it is not carried forward for Income Tax purposes.... will the same treatment be given in the books of account as well?
this is in relation to MAT calculation
Is it the same thing and amount as we calculate in the Income Tax reutrn computations?
For example- if the loss is more than 8 years it is not carried forward for Income Tax purposes.... will the same treatment be given in the books of account as well?
this is in relation to MAT calculation
22 June 2011
Brought forward loss means business loss excluding depreciation. if the company suffer a loss before claiming depreciation, than the entire amount of depreciation is unabsorbed depreciation. however, if the company suffers a loss as a result of depreciation amount than business loss will be nil and balance of depreciation amount will unabsorbed depreciation. business loss and unabsorbed depreciation under IT act is different from books loss and depreciation. it is determine d while preparing memo of taxable income.
Message likes :
1 times
22 June 2011
Thank you Mr Pushpa Raj for the reply.
Extending the query, if we are doing MAT calculation and there is a business loss in our books of accounts standing for more than 8 years, can we take it as a deduction?
Would appreciate if we can support this with something conclusive
Extending the query, if we are doing MAT calculation and there is a business loss in our books of accounts standing for more than 8 years, can we take it as a deduction?
Would appreciate if we can support this with something conclusive
23 June 2011
as the loss is to be taken as per books of accounts, so a business loss standing in books of accounts standing for more than 8 years can be considered for deduction
in Fascel Ltd V ITO (2008) case Ahd High Court provided that adjustment is required even if deduction is not permissible under income Tax Act,
in Fascel Ltd V ITO (2008) case Ahd High Court provided that adjustment is required even if deduction is not permissible under income Tax Act,
23 June 2011
Thanks a lot Mr Harish
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Applicability
- Is Aadhar PAN linking required for opening bank account?
- Where to show the RCM on Rent paid to unregistered landlord
- CPC Processing IT Return for AY 2023-24 without recognizing the Taxation Option under New Regime
- Application of 115BAC
- RCM - commercial rent paid to URP under GST
- Offsetting interest income against derivative trading losses
- TDS NUMBER SURRENDER
- GSTR-3B - Do I file nil when there is no sale but I've bought raw materials
- Legal heir raised refund , but refund issued to the closed account of deceased.
- Whether still royalty
- 20% OF DEMAND PAYMENT IN APPEAL
- Issue of gst e invoice
- Interchangeable words in accounts
- Adjusted profit/Loss in the case of LLP and Pvt. Ltd.company
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding Resignation by Auditor from Pvt. Ltd.
Trending Online Classes
-
Excel Mastery Program
CA Rishabh Pugalia
CAclubindia
