As 13 accounting for investments
This query is : Resolved
Querist : Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
17 September 2011
Dear Sirs/Madam
According to AS 13, When right shares are brought on cum right basis ( say @ Rs.105) and if the post rights issue price drops to a price lower than the acquisition cost ( say Rs.100),then according to AS 13 the sale proceeds from sale of rights ( say Rs.7) are used for REDUCING THE COST OF INVESTMENT TO REFLECT ITS MARKET VALUE and any excess sale proceeds ( of Rs.2) treated as income.
what is the case if post rights issue price drops down to Rs.95, in this case we can reduce from Cost only to the extent of Rs.7 which brings the Invest.to Rs.98 (105-7.whereas the market price is @ Rs.95. how far is it justified to say that investment shall be brought down to reflect market value?? bringing down the value from 98 to 95 is not deinately justified because we do valuatino on the closing day but not on post rights day.
Kindly clarify.
According to AS 13, When right shares are brought on cum right basis ( say @ Rs.105) and if the post rights issue price drops to a price lower than the acquisition cost ( say Rs.100),then according to AS 13 the sale proceeds from sale of rights ( say Rs.7) are used for REDUCING THE COST OF INVESTMENT TO REFLECT ITS MARKET VALUE and any excess sale proceeds ( of Rs.2) treated as income.
what is the case if post rights issue price drops down to Rs.95, in this case we can reduce from Cost only to the extent of Rs.7 which brings the Invest.to Rs.98 (105-7.whereas the market price is @ Rs.95. how far is it justified to say that investment shall be brought down to reflect market value?? bringing down the value from 98 to 95 is not deinately justified because we do valuatino on the closing day but not on post rights day.
Kindly clarify.
17 September 2011
Dear, generally post right prices do not go down such level to arise above situation, rather to some extent so accordingly this rules have been laid down keeping in view practical situation in the market.
Message likes :
1 times
Querist : Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
17 September 2011
yeah you re correct in practical situation.. but my question is on the theoritical part of interpreting the standard.
26 September 2011
well dear the concept behind deducting the price of right from the cost of cum-right shares is to bring the cost of shares on ex-right basis.
Therefore in case of Market value from 105 to 100, you are required to bring the value of investment to its market value i.e. 100, you deduct only Rs 5
In Case of Market value becoming from rs 105 to 95, only Rs 7 are required to be deducted jsut as to bring the cost of cum-right share as ex-right share cost and u r absolutely right marking to Rs 95 to be done on the closing date,a s it is all about valuation of Investment.
Theoritically, after every issue of either the bonus and right issue, The "THEORITICAL POST PRICE OF SHARE" comes down as compared to previous price
Therefore in case of Market value from 105 to 100, you are required to bring the value of investment to its market value i.e. 100, you deduct only Rs 5
In Case of Market value becoming from rs 105 to 95, only Rs 7 are required to be deducted jsut as to bring the cost of cum-right share as ex-right share cost and u r absolutely right marking to Rs 95 to be done on the closing date,a s it is all about valuation of Investment.
Theoritically, after every issue of either the bonus and right issue, The "THEORITICAL POST PRICE OF SHARE" comes down as compared to previous price
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- Inventory of finished goods
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- RCM INVOICING FROM NOV-2024
- Can we claim ITC of Feb-2024 in the month of November-2024 which was not claimed by oversight
- REGARDING 25 AS DATE OF PAYMENT AND DATE OF BOOKING
- Should I report my US salary for January, February, March in Schedule FA?
- Sale of property furniture sale
- Confusion around Form 26QB fields
- Adjustment entry in the case of Individual and HUF on 31st March
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
