These regulations are good and it won’t matter to those who know the importance of articleship and are genuinely doing one seriously.
The transfer rules since the very beginning have been unfair and vague. Earlier the transfer was possible only by mutual consent or death of principal. If mutual consent is not there, then the further remedy is not mentioned in the act which implied that if the student wants a transfer and there is no mutual consent, he has to still work with the principal inspite of disinterest, unwillingness.
Now, the case is that transfer won’t be possible just by mutual consent, but it will also require documentary proof of parents shifting. This goes against the fundamental rights in my opinion. One may register with some CA and after say 9-12 months he/she may not want to work with him. If there is no mutual consent, it means he/she has to keep his/her interests, willingness aside and work with that principal....Just because parents are not shifting elsewhere, he/she would have to work with that principal even if not interested, even if there is dissatisfaction working with him. How will a student come to know in advance which firm is good, which one is right for him/her???
Well I think we all live in democracy, and this is not done. The transfer rules are pretty vague and unfair.
Transfer is not a good idea and it should not be made easy either because students would take transfers very frequently and for very unjustified reasons. The training wont be taken seriously and students wont understand its importance. However, transfer should be made possible but with some loss to both the parties. By doing that, people would think twice before taking a transfer, they would even avoid it. Leaving aside transfer rules, everything else seems to be a good decision.
Students doing dummy article ship should be severely punished along with their principals. There shouldn't be any commitments during office hours. To do well in any aspect of life, commitment is essential. All other rules are in line of making students through professionals.
Only dal or only rice or only chapatti is never a good idea. A perfect buffet/meal serves everything in required proportions. That’s what makes success. Only ranks, only knowledge, only good communication skills have no takers. Everything has to be there, one maybe outstanding in few things, and just average at the remaining, and that’s what is expected. No one expects a person to be outstanding in all areas. (See my blog for more on this). And that’s exactly what this course is all about.
The need is to have professionals, people who can take decisions, who know what has to be done and how. The challenging part of this course is managing studies and article ship. Only those who can do it should take up the course and only those who really do this manage do well in long term.
History shows that without treating the students well, an institute can't get alumni support. Alumni would feel like doing something for their institutes only if they have been treated well in their student lifetime.