Section 54f
This query is : Resolved
20 December 2013
If a person gets capital gain on sale of plot & Invest whole of the capital gain for purchasing a residential house.But He does not have sufficient fund for purchase the residential house. My question is ......can he jointly held the property with their son or not ?
20 December 2013
The main point is that whole net consideration is required to be invested in residential property. Assessee can invest whole net consideration with other person. In short his part in joint property represent full net sale consideration.
20 December 2013
in respect of thia is there any relvent case law do you have ?
20 December 2013
CIT v. Ravinder Kumar Arora 342 ITR 38 (Delhi)
CIT v. V. Natrajan, 287 ITR 271 (Mad.)
ITO v. Smt. Saraswati Ramanathan, 116 ITD 234 (Del.)
JCIT v. Smt. Armeda K. Bhaya, 95 ITD 313 (Mum.)
CIT v. V. Natrajan, 287 ITR 271 (Mad.)
ITO v. Smt. Saraswati Ramanathan, 116 ITD 234 (Del.)
JCIT v. Smt. Armeda K. Bhaya, 95 ITD 313 (Mum.)
21 December 2013
ok but as i know that assessee could not purchase a house jointly other than his/her spouse.
In my Case Cost of the new house purchase is Rs.1 Cr & sale consideration received out of sale of plot is only Rs. 40 lakh...remaining Rs.60 lakh invested by his son can he do so ?If yes, then please send me the relvent case law.
In my Case Cost of the new house purchase is Rs.1 Cr & sale consideration received out of sale of plot is only Rs. 40 lakh...remaining Rs.60 lakh invested by his son can he do so ?If yes, then please send me the relvent case law.
23 December 2013
Sorry, i haven't any case which clearly states your q.
but another case CIT V. Ravinder Kumar Arora (Delhi) which is also joint name with his wife.However,the observation of high court clearly states that the house should be purchased by ae but it does not mandate that house should be purchased only in the name of ae.
but another case CIT V. Ravinder Kumar Arora (Delhi) which is also joint name with his wife.However,the observation of high court clearly states that the house should be purchased by ae but it does not mandate that house should be purchased only in the name of ae.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Inventory of finished goods
- Tds on building rent monthly
- REGARDING 25 AS DATE OF PAYMENT AND DATE OF BOOKING
- Sale of property furniture sale
- RCM INVOICING FROM NOV-2024
- Disallowance of Section 43B(h) to sez units
- Clarification on Documentation of Paid-Up Capital Contribution by Directors
- GST Regis.
- Can we claim ITC of Feb-2024 in the month of November-2024 which was not claimed by oversight
- Confusion around Form 26QB fields
- As per schedule III of balance sheet how to pass journal entry
- Is correct way to find out capital of individual on 31st March
- Individual capital equal to which assets of balance sheet
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
