Photocopy of register of transfers
This query is : Resolved
28 April 2012
Hello,
What is the penalty for late filing of Maharashtra VAT Return? And is the penalty mandatory or at the discretion of the AO?
What is the penalty for late filing of Maharashtra VAT Return? And is the penalty mandatory or at the discretion of the AO?
28 April 2012
Dear Sir,.
1 of the shareholder of a PVT LTD CO needs photocopy of the whole Register of Transfers. Can it be given?
Kindly mention the provision of Companies Act which govern this matter.
Kindly reply at the earliest.
Thanks & Regards,
Himani
1 of the shareholder of a PVT LTD CO needs photocopy of the whole Register of Transfers. Can it be given?
Kindly mention the provision of Companies Act which govern this matter.
Kindly reply at the earliest.
Thanks & Regards,
Himani
28 April 2012
panalty is Rs.5000/- each for VAT and CST and its mandatory
Message likes :
1 times
28 April 2012
I heard there was a very recent case between STP and the Sales Tax Dept regarding making this penalty as 'discretion of the AO'. Do you have any insights?
28 April 2012
Register of members is dealt with in Section 150 of The Companies Act,1956.
Inspection of the Register of Members is dealt with in Section 163.
Nilesh Shah
Inspection of the Register of Members is dealt with in Section 163.
Nilesh Shah
29 April 2012
Under Mah. VAT, From o1-07-2009 , penalty for non filling or late filling of return is Rs. 5000/-. There is no discretion to STO to levy or not to levy or for quantum of amount. Order is non appeal able {sect. 85(2)}. Penalty is mandatory under provisions.
Writ petitions were filed in Bombay High court challenging that sect. 29(8) ultra vires the constitution and order is not appeallable.Hon’ble High Court passed the order (Sanjay Dresses W.P. 1705 of 2009 dated 6-8-2010 and Ravindra Udyog W.P.1214 of 2010 dated 6-8-2010), It was opined that, penalty order passed without hearing is bad in law, other issues are still open for decision.
Writ petitions were filed in Bombay High court challenging that sect. 29(8) ultra vires the constitution and order is not appeallable.Hon’ble High Court passed the order (Sanjay Dresses W.P. 1705 of 2009 dated 6-8-2010 and Ravindra Udyog W.P.1214 of 2010 dated 6-8-2010), It was opined that, penalty order passed without hearing is bad in law, other issues are still open for decision.
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- REGARDING GST ON COMMERICIAL PROPERTY
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- 15ca /15cb whose income tax login? remitter or nri seller's login?
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- Regarding Documentation & Compliances for Opening of Unit of Pvt Ltd.
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- TDS U/S. 194NF
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- RCM INVOICING FROM NOV-2024
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding einvoice taken on nil rated sales
- Strategical investment in Public listed company
- CASE INTIMATION OF LIABILITY UNDER SECTION 73(5)(Rule 142(1A)
- Need to correct "Whether it is last installment " response in Form 26 QB
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
