Penalty u/s 271F
This query is : Resolved
15 March 2009
Hi,
For non filing of return, according to sec 271F there is a penalty of Rs. 5000 /-, but I have heard that the same has not been levied on any one inspite of late filing of returns.
Please confirm if i am correct & let me know if the ITO needs to take any prior permission before levying the same.
Thanks
Altaf
For non filing of return, according to sec 271F there is a penalty of Rs. 5000 /-, but I have heard that the same has not been levied on any one inspite of late filing of returns.
Please confirm if i am correct & let me know if the ITO needs to take any prior permission before levying the same.
Thanks
Altaf
16 March 2009
273B. Penalty not to be imposed in certain cases
No penalty is leviable under sections 271(1)(b), 271A, 271AA, 271B, 271BA,271BB, 271C,
271CA, 271D, 271E, 271F, 271FA, 271FB, 271G, 272A(1)(c) or 272(A)(1)(d), 272A(2),
272AA(1), 272B, 272BB(1) & (1A), 272BBB(1), 273(1)(b), 273(2)(b) or 273(2)(c) if the
assessee proves that there was reasonable cause for the said failure.
No penalty is leviable under sections 271(1)(b), 271A, 271AA, 271B, 271BA,271BB, 271C,
271CA, 271D, 271E, 271F, 271FA, 271FB, 271G, 272A(1)(c) or 272(A)(1)(d), 272A(2),
272AA(1), 272B, 272BB(1) & (1A), 272BBB(1), 273(1)(b), 273(2)(b) or 273(2)(c) if the
assessee proves that there was reasonable cause for the said failure.
16 March 2009
What should be a reasonable cause to be given to an ITO for non filing of returns in time limit.
Is there an case which I can refer to.
Is there an case which I can refer to.
16 March 2009
What should be a reasonable cause to be given to an ITO for non filing of returns in time limit.
Is there an case which I can refer to.
Is there an case which I can refer to.
16 March 2009
IT SHOULD BE GENUINE CAUSE & CONVINCING TO ITO
17 March 2009
a cause find out in a case law is that the books of a/c of assessee was seized under excise duty Act.
no other cause or case law has been found.
the cause must be very convincing
no other cause or case law has been found.
the cause must be very convincing
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- SEC 54 OF IT ACT
- Is Aadhar PAN linking required for opening bank account?
- CPC Processing IT Return for AY 2023-24 without recognizing the Taxation Option under New Regime
- Where to show the RCM on Rent paid to unregistered landlord
- Form 26QB for TDS on property
- Offsetting interest income against derivative trading losses
- DTCP approval
- Whether still royalty
- Payable outstanding for years disallowance
- RCM - commercial rent paid to URP under GST
- Input credit reversal for the FY2023-24
- Regarding Form 15CA & CB
- Issue of gst e invoice
- Interchangeable words in accounts
- Adjusted profit/Loss in the case of LLP and Pvt. Ltd.company
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding Resignation by Auditor from Pvt. Ltd.
Trending Online Classes
-
Excel Mastery Program
CA Rishabh Pugalia
CAclubindia
