Non Compliance of Provisio of CARO,2003

This query is : Resolved 

07 March 2008 Dear Sir,

what is the liability to an Auditor , if he failed to consider anyone or more than one of the clause of CARO,2003 in his report.can he justify , it is the matter of materiality . If he is liable under companies Act , under which section he found liable ?
What is the laiblity under CA Act,1949 ?

07 March 2008 It is not possible to answer this question in a general way. The severity depends upon case to case basis.

07 March 2008 Thank you Sir,

Is an auditor specifically liable for non-cpmliance of provisions of CARO ,2003 or not ?


07 March 2008 DEFINITELY AN AUDITOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ACTS OF OMISSION OR COMMISSION AND PROFESSIONAL LAPSES OR EVEN POOR JUDGEMENTS OR BIASED JUDGEMENTS .
UNDER SEC 233 FOR PENALTY (FOR NON COMPLIANCE UNDER SEC 227 TO 229,)THE AUDITOR IS LIABLE FOR ANY DOCUMENT SIGNED OR AUTHENTICATED WHICH IS NOT IN CONFORMITY WITH REQUIREMENTS OF SEC 227 TO SEC 229 .
ANY DCUMENT INCLUDES OBVIOUSLY CARO 2003 ALSO.
R.V.RAO

07 March 2008 THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR PAINED TO ANSWERE MT QUERY




You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now

Join CCI Pro
CAclubindia's WhatsApp Groups Link


Similar Resolved Queries


loading


Unanswered Queries