13 December 2011
Section 226 is silent about the appointment of relative as Auditor of the company. However, the council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India has suggested that a chartered accountant shall not accept the audit of a company where he is relative of the company's managing director or whole-time director and he believes that he would not be in a position to express his independent opinion.
13 December 2011
whether there should be any disclosure requirement in the audit report, if relative of director is appointed as an auditor of the company
13 December 2011
No disclosure requirement prescribed bcoz appointment of relative as auditor is not advisable from the ICAI point of view.
RG
Querist :
Anonymous
Querist :
Anonymous
(Querist)
13 December 2011
In context to your reply, if auditor believes that his independent status will not be lost, in that case he may be appointed as an auditor.... In that scenario whether disclosure required.....
15 December 2011
Let us analyze the entire situation.
First we will go through the Provision of Section 226 of Companies Act which disqualifies persons who can be appointed as auditor. The following persons cannot be appointed as auditor: (a) a body corporate; (b) an officer or employee of the company;
(c) a person who is a partner, or who is in the employment, of an officer or employee of the company;
(d) a person who is indebted to the company for an amount exceeding one thousand rupees, or who has given any guarantee or provided any security in connection with the indebtedness of any third person to the company for an amount exceeding one thousand rupees;
e) a person holding any security of that company after a period of one year from the date of commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000.
Explanation.—For the purpose of this section, “security” means an instrument which carries voting rights.
This provision is silent regarding appointment of auditor who is relative of director.
Now we will move on to second part..
The Chartered Accountant Regulation Act:
Clause (4) to Part I of The Second Schedule reads as follows:
A CA will be guilty of professional misconduct if he "expresses his opinion on financial statements of any business or enterprise in which he, his firm, or a partner in his firm has a substantial interest;
Now if the father holds substantial interest in the enterprise then the son can be termed as also holding substantial interest in business - beneficially...
Therefore in essence after amendment of Chartered Accountant Regulation Act (2006) relative cannot be appointed.
Earlier this clause allowed such appointments if the auditor disclosed his interest also in the audit report.
Now after amendment such question of appointment may not arise.