Late filing of exp 4 return-remedies
This query is : Resolved
10 July 2013
Qst. According to Notification 42/2012 dated 29.06.2012 service tax is exempted on Service provided by a commission agent outside India and engaged under a contract or agreement or any other document by the exporter in India, to act on behalf of the exporter, to cause sale of goods exported by him subject to conditions.
We fulfill all condition except late filing the EXP 4 return.
Actual due date for the period Apr'12 to Sept'12 is 15.10.2012 but we filed it on 27.02.2013.
Now department issue show cause notice and demanding service tax.
What are the remedies available to this matter??
Please reply as it urgent.
We fulfill all condition except late filing the EXP 4 return.
Actual due date for the period Apr'12 to Sept'12 is 15.10.2012 but we filed it on 27.02.2013.
Now department issue show cause notice and demanding service tax.
What are the remedies available to this matter??
Please reply as it urgent.
10 July 2013
Due date for April- June 2012 was 25/11/2012 and for July-Sept 2012 was 30/04/2013.
And just because you did not filed ur return (As u said) department cannot ask u to pay service tax, but will demand late fling fees.
And just because you did not filed ur return (As u said) department cannot ask u to pay service tax, but will demand late fling fees.
11 July 2013
Pradeep Nainawati.
This is not ST-3 return. It is EXP 4 return as per Notification 42/2012
This is not ST-3 return. It is EXP 4 return as per Notification 42/2012
14 July 2013
one of the condition to avail exemption is that return should be filed within 15 days. But non compliance of such procedural lapse cannot be a ground to disallow the substantial benefits given under law.
Kindly refer case law of Um Cables Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others [2013-TIOL-386-HC-MUM-CX]
In this case the High Court of Mumbai held that rebate under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules,2002 cannot be rejected on grounds of non submission of original and duplicate ARE-1 forms, which is only a procedural requirement under notification issued under Rule 18 thereof.
On the basis of above judgement you can argue with officers.
Kindly refer case law of Um Cables Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others [2013-TIOL-386-HC-MUM-CX]
In this case the High Court of Mumbai held that rebate under Rule 18 of the Central Excise Rules,2002 cannot be rejected on grounds of non submission of original and duplicate ARE-1 forms, which is only a procedural requirement under notification issued under Rule 18 thereof.
On the basis of above judgement you can argue with officers.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- REGARDING GST ON COMMERICIAL PROPERTY
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- 15ca /15cb whose income tax login? remitter or nri seller's login?
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- Regarding Documentation & Compliances for Opening of Unit of Pvt Ltd.
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- TDS U/S. 194NF
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- RCM INVOICING FROM NOV-2024
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding einvoice taken on nil rated sales
- Strategical investment in Public listed company
- CASE INTIMATION OF LIABILITY UNDER SECTION 73(5)(Rule 142(1A)
- Need to correct "Whether it is last installment " response in Form 26 QB
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
