Interesting case. need suggestion n case law.
This query is : Resolved
19 January 2012
Two Cases:-
1.) Y purchase goods(i.e gold) from Z on challan basis(not by invoice)due to non fixation of goods price on 29.12.2010 n 30.11.2011, and sold these goods on the same day. Later on 4.4.2011 invoice prepared by Z of the above goods.
Y claim the vat input given on purchase of goods in Quarter- IV of 2010-11 but department can't accept it n raised demand of vat output of goods sold without giving credit of vat input n said vat input should be claim in Ist Quarter of 2011-12.
Was Y claim acceptable? What should Y do? Is there any case law related to this situation?...
2.) P sold stolen goods to Q against vat invoice. Q purchased goods in good faith. So,
Is Q liable for confiscation of goods, for any penalty, for any legal proceedings ? Is there any Case Law related?
1.) Y purchase goods(i.e gold) from Z on challan basis(not by invoice)due to non fixation of goods price on 29.12.2010 n 30.11.2011, and sold these goods on the same day. Later on 4.4.2011 invoice prepared by Z of the above goods.
Y claim the vat input given on purchase of goods in Quarter- IV of 2010-11 but department can't accept it n raised demand of vat output of goods sold without giving credit of vat input n said vat input should be claim in Ist Quarter of 2011-12.
Was Y claim acceptable? What should Y do? Is there any case law related to this situation?...
2.) P sold stolen goods to Q against vat invoice. Q purchased goods in good faith. So,
Is Q liable for confiscation of goods, for any penalty, for any legal proceedings ? Is there any Case Law related?
21 January 2012
Input Credit is available on the basis of tax invoice which is dated 04-04-2011. Input credit can be allowed in Qrt I of 11-12.
Claim of Y is not acceptable.
2. Q is liable for confiscation at present by Police Department. Has to contest the case on bonafide to prove the genuineness of transaction. Depends on judgement of Criminal Court.
Claim of Y is not acceptable.
2. Q is liable for confiscation at present by Police Department. Has to contest the case on bonafide to prove the genuineness of transaction. Depends on judgement of Criminal Court.
Message likes :
1 times
21 January 2012
thanks Mr. Kochar 4 ur consideration.
In 1st case, can u give any reference to either any CASE decided or any PROVISION of Vat Act.
2nd case, is there any CASE similar to dis situation?
In 1st case, can u give any reference to either any CASE decided or any PROVISION of Vat Act.
2nd case, is there any CASE similar to dis situation?
27 January 2012
1. u/r. 51(1)(a) : Setoff is available of the sum collected seperately on purchases by the other Regd. dealer from whom the purchases are effected. Input credit is to be claimed only in the return as per periodicity in which dt. 04-04-11 is covered.
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- Inventory of finished goods
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- Tds on building rent monthly
- GST ON EXPORT COMMISSION
- Should I report my US salary for January, February, March in Schedule FA?
- RCM INVOICING FROM NOV-2024
- Sale of property furniture sale
- Confusion around Form 26QB fields
- Adjustment entry in the case of Individual and HUF on 31st March
- Stock difference tax applicable on composite rate or normal rate
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
