Income escaping assessment u/s 147
This query is : Resolved
02 November 2014
One of our client serve with notice u/s 148.The reason for such notice is improper deduction under house property. This notice is valid as there was mistake in claiming house property deduction due to which there is some income which has escaped. Now if AO go for 147 proceeding then he will scrutinize other heads of income also like capital gain, other sources etc. But my client does not have proper record of capital gain. So will AO have right to add those incomes also on the basis of lack of record ????
02 November 2014
AO cannot use a 148 proceeding to open up other aspects of the return. only that portion which is covered under the notice shall looked into.
04 November 2014
But Nikhil,
It is clearly written in Explanation 3 to section 147, which read as follows
"For the purpose of assessment or reassessment under this section, the AO may assess or reassess the income in respect of any issue, which has escaped assessment, and such issue comes to his notice subsequently in the course of the proceedings under this section, notwithstanding that the reason for such issue have not been included in the reasons recorded under subsection(2) of section 148.
It is clearly written in Explanation 3 to section 147, which read as follows
"For the purpose of assessment or reassessment under this section, the AO may assess or reassess the income in respect of any issue, which has escaped assessment, and such issue comes to his notice subsequently in the course of the proceedings under this section, notwithstanding that the reason for such issue have not been included in the reasons recorded under subsection(2) of section 148.
04 November 2014
Dear Vap,
my partial mistake...
in your case, the explanation will hold good given that the initial ground of reassessment holds good (error in house property income).
Had that ground been rejected, then the AO wont have been able to look into other incomes...refer Bombay High court judgment in Jet Airways case ( ITA No.1714 of 2009 with ITA No.1426 of 2008)
my partial mistake...
in your case, the explanation will hold good given that the initial ground of reassessment holds good (error in house property income).
Had that ground been rejected, then the AO wont have been able to look into other incomes...refer Bombay High court judgment in Jet Airways case ( ITA No.1714 of 2009 with ITA No.1426 of 2008)
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- GST on export of services and Input Credit
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- RCM applicability on Rent Paid by Registered Person to Unregistered Landlord for Residental Building
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- Inventory of finished goods
- Quiery in relation to GST liability in case of an advocate who has obtained GST registration.
- Confusion around Form 26QB fields
- RCM INVOICING FROM NOV-2024
- Tds on building rent monthly
- Should I be worried about and rectify reporting Jan,Feb ,March 2024 foreign salary in schedule FA?
- BUYING PROPERTY COULD NOT FILE 26QB
- Gst input for FY 23-24
- Regarding Waiver of Interest levied u/s 50 of PGST/CGST Act
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
