Deposit or loan
This query is : Resolved
23 November 2013
An unlisted public company's director has brought in cash in the company. Whether it should be treated as loan or deposit?
23 November 2013
Purely loan, no question of deposit for such amount
Message likes :
1 times
23 November 2013
It will be treated as loan and it will not be considered as deposit, because loan taken from director is not considered as deposit.
Message likes :
1 times
23 November 2013
Providing finance to the company may not be considered as or equated to sale of goods or materials to the company. So also, the same would not tantamount to supply of any services by a director to the company. The consent of the Board of directors pursuant to section 297 would not, therefore, be required. Whereas providing funds to the company may not be considered as a contract falling u/s 297, the same is definitely an arrangement in which director is directly or indirectly interested or concerned and therefore, the disclosure pursuant to section 299 would invariably be required to be made to the Board of directors of the company. Even after disclosing his interest, the concerned director should not take undue advantage because his position is very much like that of a trustee as was held in Kashinath v New Alok Ginning & Pressing Co. Ltd. (1950) 20 Comp Cas 225 (Nag).
Providing finance to the company may not be considered as or equated to sale of goods or materials to the company. So also, the same would not tantamount to supply of any services by a director to the company. The consent of the Board of directors pursuant to section 297 would not, therefore, be required. Whereas providing funds to the company may not be considered as a contract falling u/s 297, the same is definitely an arrangement in which director is directly or indirectly interested or concerned and therefore, the disclosure pursuant to section 299 would invariably be required to be made to the Board of directors of the company. Even after disclosing his interest, the concerned director should not take undue advantage because his position is very much like that of a trustee as was held in Kashinath v New Alok Ginning & Pressing Co. Ltd. (1950) 20 Comp Cas 225 (Nag).
Message likes :
1 times
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Manual Rectification through AO
- IT Return filed defective u/s 139 (9)
- Fixed Deposit Claim Relinquishment by the Nominee
- Defective Return - Tds on advance
- Income Type for interest from government bonds
- TCS ON SOFTWARE SALES
- Not a CA , can we prepare balance sheet
- Valuation of diamonds as on 01.04.2001
- What is meaning of merging of expenses or income in accounts
- Accounting treatment of write off sundry debtors
- Gstr 9 2023-24
- GSTR-9 HSN Summary and Credit Note without item
- Interchangeable words in accounts
- Adjusted profit/Loss in the case of LLP and Pvt. Ltd.company
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- GST RCM not shown in GSTR-3B
- Bill from Dispatched from issue.
Trending Online Classes
-
Landmark Judgments: Important Provisions of the EPF & ESI Act interpreted by the Honorable Supreme Court of India
Mr.Balamurugan Ranganathan15 November 2024
CAclubindia
