Define Contract
This query is : Resolved
15 December 2009
Please define Contract under Income Tax Act.
It is necessary that contract should be in writting and enforceable in the court of law for Tax purpose
It is necessary that contract should be in writting and enforceable in the court of law for Tax purpose
15 December 2009
The term contract has been defined in the Income Tax Act vide s. 194C(1).
It says any person responsible for paying any sum to any resident (hereinafter referred to as the contractor) for carrying out any work including supply of labour for carrying out any work....
For the purpose of Income-tax; it is not necessary that contract should be in writing. From the nature of transactions; it is decided that it is a contract.
It says any person responsible for paying any sum to any resident (hereinafter referred to as the contractor) for carrying out any work including supply of labour for carrying out any work....
For the purpose of Income-tax; it is not necessary that contract should be in writing. From the nature of transactions; it is decided that it is a contract.
16 December 2009
For the purpose of enforcement of contract following should be kept in mind.
A contract is established when it is proposed by first party and accepted by second party. This acceptance may by expressed by action or in writting. Once the acceptence is communicated by any mean, one can say that a legal contract has been established.
It is not necessary that a contract should be in writting only, however, one should be in a possition to prove the factors of the contract.
As per Evidence Act, the documents are prevailed over all other evidences.
Hope, I could be able to clarify your point.
Regards
A contract is established when it is proposed by first party and accepted by second party. This acceptance may by expressed by action or in writting. Once the acceptence is communicated by any mean, one can say that a legal contract has been established.
It is not necessary that a contract should be in writting only, however, one should be in a possition to prove the factors of the contract.
As per Evidence Act, the documents are prevailed over all other evidences.
Hope, I could be able to clarify your point.
Regards
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Inventory of finished goods
- REGARDING 25 AS DATE OF PAYMENT AND DATE OF BOOKING
- Tds on building rent monthly
- Can we claim ITC of Feb-2024 in the month of November-2024 which was not claimed by oversight
- Clarification on Documentation of Paid-Up Capital Contribution by Directors
- Sale of property furniture sale
- Quiery in relation to GST liability in case of an advocate who has obtained GST registration.
- Confusion around Form 26QB fields
- RCM INVOICING FROM NOV-2024
- GST Regis.
- Applicability of Ind As to associate of associate
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- Regarding einvoice taken on nil rated sales
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
