CENVAT
This query is : Resolved
08 November 2010
Hi,
while making CE Invoice i have put duty amount lesser than actual, what is the procedure to rectify it.
while making CE Invoice i have put duty amount lesser than actual, what is the procedure to rectify it.
08 November 2010
you have to cancel the invoice and intimate the same to the CE Officer about the same.
Message likes :
1 times
08 November 2010
CE Invoice is prepared in the month of june 2010 & returns are filed, but the buyer is asking for new bill with actual duty amount.pls clarify
09 November 2010
Issue Supplementary Invoice. Pay differential duty alongwith interest for the delayed period. This information shuld get reflected in the current ER1.
Message likes :
1 times
09 November 2010
Hello.
I believe that you are a qualified CA.If yes, than atleast a detailed query, with full facts is expected from a qualified CA Like you. If you are not qualified CA, then also a query, with full facts is expected from you,.There is no point is wasting other's time by putting peacemeal questions.
In which circumstances you have mentioned less duty in invoice than actual. No businessman will do business like this.How you came to know actual duty ? If you were aware about actual duty, why you have paid less ? If actual duty was known to you and eventhough you have paid less duty that means you have intentionally paid less duty.
Before putting a querry did you gone through any excise provision? or straight-a-way whatever came to your mind, you raised a query like a SSC Pass Accountant.
I do not mean to insult you but before putting auery just read the legal provisions and than put the query.
Expert CA Reddy and Abhidas has given reply like an Accountant ann not like CA, giving satisfactory legal reply.
On hearing from you, I shall give you reply.
Regards.
DILIP DARJI.
09909921129.
I believe that you are a qualified CA.If yes, than atleast a detailed query, with full facts is expected from a qualified CA Like you. If you are not qualified CA, then also a query, with full facts is expected from you,.There is no point is wasting other's time by putting peacemeal questions.
In which circumstances you have mentioned less duty in invoice than actual. No businessman will do business like this.How you came to know actual duty ? If you were aware about actual duty, why you have paid less ? If actual duty was known to you and eventhough you have paid less duty that means you have intentionally paid less duty.
Before putting a querry did you gone through any excise provision? or straight-a-way whatever came to your mind, you raised a query like a SSC Pass Accountant.
I do not mean to insult you but before putting auery just read the legal provisions and than put the query.
Expert CA Reddy and Abhidas has given reply like an Accountant ann not like CA, giving satisfactory legal reply.
On hearing from you, I shall give you reply.
Regards.
DILIP DARJI.
09909921129.
09 November 2010
.........................................
19 November 2010
Dear experts
Thanks,
Thanks,
19 November 2010
...
19 November 2010
Nobody is perfect. Even experts learn from queries. No organisation is perferct and no software can claim to have readymade answers to the requirements of everchanging indian tax system. There are bound to be instances of charge of wrong duty either by manual error or system error. There was nothing wrong in the query. Mr. Hanumantha Reddy's reply based on the initial query, was correct one. My reply was based on the further clarification by queriest. Both solutions are correct and within the procedures of excise law. There is nothing wrong in the query or replies. I think Mr. Dilip Darji is working in a very perfect set up and has not faced such problem.
Message likes :
1 times
19 November 2010
Dear Sirs.
You are right that I am working in a perfect set-up but I have came across so many such instances of mistakes committed by human or softaware.
My point is that in this forum, the literate and qualified persons are meeting and we should give reply to the queriest in a technical language so that queriest can understand the technical reply and can get ready to face the situation in future, with legal backing.
I did mentioned that I do not mean to insult qualified personas, At the same time I expect that querry to be raised by a qualified person in a qualified manner.
Technical reply would be cetainly helpful to the the queriest in addition to anyone who is referring to queryy. If relevant clause of the act ot rules are cited, any CA can go through the provisions of the act and rules and it would help him for his balance life. I am very sorry, if I had hurt anyone by putting hard reply.
You are right that I am working in a perfect set-up but I have came across so many such instances of mistakes committed by human or softaware.
My point is that in this forum, the literate and qualified persons are meeting and we should give reply to the queriest in a technical language so that queriest can understand the technical reply and can get ready to face the situation in future, with legal backing.
I did mentioned that I do not mean to insult qualified personas, At the same time I expect that querry to be raised by a qualified person in a qualified manner.
Technical reply would be cetainly helpful to the the queriest in addition to anyone who is referring to queryy. If relevant clause of the act ot rules are cited, any CA can go through the provisions of the act and rules and it would help him for his balance life. I am very sorry, if I had hurt anyone by putting hard reply.
19 November 2010
My sincere advise to you is that first answer the query if have any different opinion to the earlier answer that’s it. Why all the nonsense issues/arguments instead of spelling beans on someone. No more argument or comment on the others. Further, you told that I am very sorry, if I had hurt anyone by putting hard reply. What is it mean? Don’t you know how to comment on summons’s skills? Everyone will say sorry at the end why you people don’t know how to communicate with unknown persons. Just look at you have not answered the query at all. Further, note that all the literatures are not well known about the technical issues unless they are working/updating the taxes. If it so then the peoples won’t come and put queries in CAclub. Further, the person needs any rule references/notification references/section references he would defiantly asks in the next query or he would approach someone around to get the clarity. Merely referring section/rule would never give the answer unless what the section/rule says has presented in such a manner to understand easily. Pls cherries it that an expert never comment on someone’s answer rather he would answer the query/advises.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Manual Rectification through AO
- IT Return filed defective u/s 139 (9)
- Fixed Deposit Claim Relinquishment by the Nominee
- Defective Return - Tds on advance
- Income Type for interest from government bonds
- Not a CA , can we prepare balance sheet
- TCS ON SOFTWARE SALES
- SHARE TRANSFER PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY
- Car Purchases in Daughter Name
- Invoicing in different currency
- ITR 6 Schedule CFL and UD Issues
- Gstr 9 2023-24
- GSTR-9 HSN Summary and Credit Note without item
- Interchangeable words in accounts
- Adjusted profit/Loss in the case of LLP and Pvt. Ltd.company
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
- GST RCM not shown in GSTR-3B
Trending Online Classes
-
Landmark Judgments: Important Provisions of the EPF & ESI Act interpreted by the Honorable Supreme Court of India
Mr.Balamurugan Ranganathan15 November 2024
CAclubindia
