cash payments
This query is : Resolved
02 February 2009
Deal Experter,
Ihave doubt i.e"If A OF Bangalore sold goods to B OF Chennai order comes from Chennai But goods are delievered to Bangalore Branch But in invioce it shows TIN Number of Chennai office & it is an C Form sale" Please Suggested me weather CST or VAT Charged by A.
Ihave doubt i.e"If A OF Bangalore sold goods to B OF Chennai order comes from Chennai But goods are delievered to Bangalore Branch But in invioce it shows TIN Number of Chennai office & it is an C Form sale" Please Suggested me weather CST or VAT Charged by A.
02 February 2009
CASH PAYMENTS EXCEEDING RS 20,000
1)If the company is making cash payments exceeding Rs 20,000 (at one stroke for 2 bills)to employees for their petrol reimbursement, what are the legal implications ?
2) further, in such (above mentioned)cases, is it mandatory for company to affix revenue stamp on cash payment vouchers ? If co does not affix, what are the legal implications ?
3)Is there any circular stating that co reimbursing to employees, need not have ravenue stamp affixed, for cash payments exceeding 5000
Pl revert at the earliest
1)If the company is making cash payments exceeding Rs 20,000 (at one stroke for 2 bills)to employees for their petrol reimbursement, what are the legal implications ?
2) further, in such (above mentioned)cases, is it mandatory for company to affix revenue stamp on cash payment vouchers ? If co does not affix, what are the legal implications ?
3)Is there any circular stating that co reimbursing to employees, need not have ravenue stamp affixed, for cash payments exceeding 5000
Pl revert at the earliest
02 February 2009
CST 2 % to be charg against form "C" Bill to issued in name of Buyer (B)Chennai but you will also mention Delivery address of consignee (Banglore) party in Invoice.
02 February 2009
Answer to AJK
1) Section 40A(3) attracts. Means entire expenses will be disallowed.
2) Yes.If doesn't affix the voucher has no validity before a court of law.
3) No,according to my knowledge.
1) Section 40A(3) attracts. Means entire expenses will be disallowed.
2) Yes.If doesn't affix the voucher has no validity before a court of law.
3) No,according to my knowledge.
02 February 2009
Thank a lot Ram Avtar Singh sir
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Manual Rectification through AO
- IT Return filed defective u/s 139 (9)
- Fixed Deposit Claim Relinquishment by the Nominee
- Defective Return - Tds on advance
- Not a CA , can we prepare balance sheet
- TCS ON SOFTWARE SALES
- Income Type for interest from government bonds
- Adjustment at the beginning of the year
- Bifurcation of prepaid expenses
- Is income taxable or receivable or received in case of LLP and company
- TDS - Form 26QB - Installment - Final payment Query
- ITR 6 Schedule CFL and UD Issues
- Gstr 9 2023-24
- GSTR-9 HSN Summary and Credit Note without item
- Interchangeable words in accounts
- Adjusted profit/Loss in the case of LLP and Pvt. Ltd.company
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
- Query for dubts
Trending Online Classes
-
Landmark Judgments: Important Provisions of the EPF & ESI Act interpreted by the Honorable Supreme Court of India
Mr.Balamurugan Ranganathan15 November 2024
CAclubindia
