Dear sir,

In case of ITR 4 the income from 44AD civil construction, assessee does not come under 44AA ,whether we requied to provide gross receiipts/profit as income ( Schdule P&L Item No 51) of the during the period.
Please give me an expert opinion.

Aleel
Calicut

how to audit in given below areas under MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES POINT OF VIEW

a. bills discounting
b. pre & post shipment
c. lease

pls. send auditchecklists to my mail id also
prakarthi@gmail.com

the cases pending before incometax settlement commisssion shall be complied with payment of tax and interest thereon in respect additional income disclosed in the application on or before 31.7.2007 to see the application is further proceded with and to avoid abatement. the reliable information is the pendency is too large that the pending application is unlikely to be settled by 31.03.2008,the deadline imposed in finance act 2007. the non completion shall again would result in abatement of the case as if no application is filed. is there any remedy to avoid such abatement after payment of taxes and interest by 31.7.07

OUR PROFESSIONAL BILL INCLUDE SERVICE TAX WHICH IS OUR LIABILITY ON WHICH AMOUNT TDS SHOULD BE DEDUCTED NET OR GROSS INCLUDING SERVICE TAX

The FC Was received through designated bank account and the amount was deposited in Mutual Fund through issuing cheque from the designated bank account. this was done for the purpose of income generation. whether there is any violation ?. Where shall we show this deposit in FORM FC 3

Whether the provisions relating to restriction on transfer of immovable property u/s 230A in form no.34A are still applicable or withdrawn?

is there any violation of foreign contribution act if a charitable institution deposited the foreign contribution received in FD with Private Finance companies.

While registering at the IT Dept. site for efiling which DOB should be used for HUF assessee. DOB is compulsory for registering at IT Dept. site. In ITR-2 form, we need to put 31/03/2007 as DOB for HUF assessee.

sir/ma'm

sir in many case i have seen that the exporter recovers lesser freight from buyer than it actually pays to the CHA.
whether it is a correct practice in view that it directly effect the FOB value as FOB is increased & thus extra export incentives are received.
whether FEMA permits such contracts to recover lesser payment on account of freight??