Aman Baranwal

I am Currently engaged in the Audit of a Public limited Company. After Inspection of purchase vouchers, i have seen that old excise Rates @10%/14% are charged by A dealer even if invoice are Raised after Excise Rates are Reduced(24.02.2009) to 8%.
Dealer says that he has purchased these goods before 24th February 2009 therefore he has charged Excise @14%/10%.
In these Scenario Company are Paying excess Excise Duty.
Company can Claim Excess Excise Duty paid as CENVAT CREDIT but Working Capital Requirement of the Company is Increased.

Does the dealer response regarding Excess Ex. Duty is Correct. Please tell me Reasons in this Case.


Aman Baranwal

I am Currently engaged in the Audit of a Public limited Company. After Inspection of purchase vouchers, i have seen that old excise Rates @10%/14% are charged by A dealer even if invoice are Raised after Excise Rates are Reduced(24.02.2009) to 8%.
Dealer says that he has purchased these goods before 24th February 2009 therefore he has charged Excise @14%/10%.
In these Scenario Company are Paying excess Excise Duty.
Company can Claim Excess Excise Duty paid as CENVAT CREDIT but Working Capital Requirement of the Company is Increased.

Does the dealer response regarding Excess Ex. Duty is Correct. Please tell me Reasons in this Case.


CA Amrish Gupta
29 March 2009 at 18:17

EXPORT SALE VOUCHING

HELLO,
CAN ANY ONE TELL ME THE KEY POINTS THAT I KEEP UNDER CONSIDERATION WHILE PERFORMING EXPORT SALE VOUCHING.



gaurav
29 March 2009 at 13:55

change of auditor

My client is very upset with his former statutory auditor of Private limited co. He wants me to appoint his auditor during this financial year. So tell me the way of change of statutory auditor of the co. Present statutory auditor does not file his form 23 in ROC (checked from mca site).
Now we dont have time to call EGM also. Is taking resignation from him is the only simple way out without tension


Anuraag Sharma
29 March 2009 at 02:08

Appointment of Auditor u/s 224

Case : X Ltd. was incorporated on 01-02-1998 and Mr. P was appointed as auditor by the Board of Directors in their meeting held on 03-03-1998.

According to sec. 224, the board of directors shall appoint the first auditor of a company within one month of the date of registration of the company by a valid resolution. Further, if the board fails to do so shareholders shall appoint first auditor in the general meeting.

In the present case the date of incorporation is 01-02-1998 and the directors have appointed Mr. P as the first auditor on 03-02-1998 i.e. to say after one month.

Query : was this appointment valid or it should be deemed as void so that it could give rise to the powers of Central Government conferred upon it by sec. 224(3)


Chandan Kumar De
28 March 2009 at 17:17

List of Audit Firms

can any one send me the list of CA Firms situated in kolkata....??????
my email id is imsubhode@rediffmail.com


CA CMA NARESH
28 March 2009 at 15:12

changes in accouanting period

Dear Sir/Madam,


I want to know what if effect statutorily on changes in accouanting period for mfg co.


CA Keyur Shah
27 March 2009 at 18:59

disallowances of exps....

hiiiiii,
The co. has incurred exp. of Rs. 40000. The payment of exp. is made by the co. directly by depositing cash into party's bank account.
So whether this exp. is going to be disallowed because of payment exceeding Rs. 20000 by cash???????????????


Karuna Sethi
27 March 2009 at 18:38

Company Audit

why is interest paid to shareholders u/s 208 during long gestation period?
Plz explain with an example.