271(1)(c)
This query is : Resolved
06 April 2018
271(1)(C) is applicable for non maintenance of books of accounts for non acceptance by Assessing Officer for source of income
06 April 2018
is it a question????
06 April 2018
Section 271(1)(c) empower to Income Tax Authority to levy penalty under the Act, if the assessee officer or commissioner appeal or the principal commission during the any proceeding is satisfied that assessee has concealed the particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income, he may direct to Assessee shall pay by way of penalty ,sum which shall not be less than but which shall not exceed three times amount of tax sought to be evaded by reason of the concealment of particulars of income or furnished inaccurate particulars of Income. In other words, Income tax authority may levy penalty, if any of the following conditions has satisfied.
1. Assessee has concealed the particulars of his Income.
2. Assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars of income.
No penalty can be impost u/s 271 (1) (c) of the act on the preponderance of probability that the claim of expenditure was concealment the particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income. Therefore It was held that merely making a claim, which is not sustainable in law, by itself, will not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars regarding the income of the assessee.
1. Assessee has concealed the particulars of his Income.
2. Assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars of income.
No penalty can be impost u/s 271 (1) (c) of the act on the preponderance of probability that the claim of expenditure was concealment the particulars of his income or furnished inaccurate particulars of income. Therefore It was held that merely making a claim, which is not sustainable in law, by itself, will not amount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars regarding the income of the assessee.
06 April 2018
All type of concealment or incorrect furnishing of particulars doesn't attract attract
penalty. It is a matter of judgement based on the facts of each case.
penalty. It is a matter of judgement based on the facts of each case.
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Inventory of finished goods
- Disallowance of Section 43B(h) to sez units
- REGARDING 25 AS DATE OF PAYMENT AND DATE OF BOOKING
- Confusion around Form 26QB fields
- RCM INVOICING FROM NOV-2024
- GST Regis.
- Quiery in relation to GST liability in case of an advocate who has obtained GST registration.
- Tds on building rent monthly
- Can we claim ITC of Feb-2024 in the month of November-2024 which was not claimed by oversight
- Sale of property furniture sale
- As per schedule III of balance sheet how to pass journal entry
- Is correct way to find out capital of individual on 31st March
- Individual capital equal to which assets of balance sheet
- LAST YEAR 2022-23 ITC IN NEXT YEAR 2023-24 REPORITNG IN GSTR-9
- MIS MATCH OF INVOICE NUMBER
- IGST Credit-Show cause notice issued-confusion
- Issue of gst e invoice
- How to adjusted advances given or receipt
- Foreign vendor without PAN unable to to register due to non receipt of OTP on foreign number ?
- 133(6) DIN INVALID format error - ->WHERE TO REPLY 133(6) notice?
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
