SEC 2(22)(e)
This query is : Resolved
26 July 2010
whether share premium is included in accumulated profit u/s 2(22)(e) of i tax act.Please let me know about this one.
regards
kamal khaitan
regards
kamal khaitan
26 July 2010
Please visit this link
https://www.caclubindia.com/articles/deemed-dividend-section-2-22-e-of-income-tax-act-1961-6121.asp
https://www.caclubindia.com/articles/deemed-dividend-section-2-22-e-of-income-tax-act-1961-6121.asp
26 July 2010
No Share premium is not Included in Accumulated Profits for the purpose of Sec 2(22)(e). When there is a statutory bar on the share premium account being used for distribution of dividend, the deeming provision of Section 2(22)(e) cannot apply.
Section 2(22) of the Act has used the expression 'accumulated profits', 'whether capitalized or not'. This expression tends to show that under Section 2(22) it is only the distribution of the accumulated profits which are deemed to be dividends in the hands of the shareholders. By using the expression 'whether capitalized or not' the legislative intent clearly is that the profits which are deemed to be dividend would be those which were capable of being accumulated and which would also be capable of being capitalized. The amounts should, in other words, be in the nature of profits which the company would have distributed to its shareholders. This would clearly exclude return of part of a capital to the company, as the same cannot be regarded as profit capable of being capitalized, the return being of capital itself.
Citation: Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Maipo India Ltd. on 7 March, 2008.
For detail case law check following link---
http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/1442166/
Section 2(22) of the Act has used the expression 'accumulated profits', 'whether capitalized or not'. This expression tends to show that under Section 2(22) it is only the distribution of the accumulated profits which are deemed to be dividends in the hands of the shareholders. By using the expression 'whether capitalized or not' the legislative intent clearly is that the profits which are deemed to be dividend would be those which were capable of being accumulated and which would also be capable of being capitalized. The amounts should, in other words, be in the nature of profits which the company would have distributed to its shareholders. This would clearly exclude return of part of a capital to the company, as the same cannot be regarded as profit capable of being capitalized, the return being of capital itself.
Citation: Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Maipo India Ltd. on 7 March, 2008.
For detail case law check following link---
http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/1442166/
26 July 2010
Share premium income is excluded from the purview of sec 2 (22) (e)
You need to be the querist or approved CAclub expert to take part in this query .
Click here to login now
Click here to login now
Similar Resolved Queries
Unanswered Queries
- Is this income indian or foreign income?
- ITC temporary reversal and reclaim
- Applicable TDS rate for sale of property in Nov 2024
- Inventory of finished goods
- Sale of property furniture sale
- REGARDING 25 AS DATE OF PAYMENT AND DATE OF BOOKING
- Quiery in relation to GST liability in case of an advocate who has obtained GST registration.
- Confusion around Form 26QB fields
- Tds on building rent monthly
- Can we claim ITC of Feb-2024 in the month of November-2024 which was not claimed by oversight
- Clarification on Documentation of Paid-Up Capital Contribution by Directors
- TDS under section and rate of TDS
- TDS under section 194Q and TCS under section 206C
- GST input on car insurance and repairs
- GST input on Diwali gift to employee
- GST input on Mobile Handset
- Material and freight in same invoice
- TDS under section 194J inclusive of reimbursement of expenses
- Should I be worried about and rectify reporting Jan,Feb ,March 2024 foreign salary in schedule FA?
- BUYING PROPERTY COULD NOT FILE 26QB
Trending Online Classes
CAclubindia
