Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The Hon'ble Delhi High Court in M/s. Hero Motocorp Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors [Review Petition 318/2022 in W.P.(C) 2032/2019 dated December 15, 2022] has dismissed the review petition filed by the Revenue Department, and upheld the order passed by

The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in M/s. Wipro Limited India v. the Assistant Commissioner of Central Taxes and Ors. [Writ Petition No. 16175 of 2022 (T-Res) dated January 6, 2023] has allowed the assessee to rectify the errors committed at the time

The Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court in Micro Marbles Private Limited v. Office of the Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Chittorgarh, Rajasthan [D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13719/2021 dated January 4, 2023] set aside the notice issued by of the Income Tax Off

THE SUPREME COURT directed insurer to pay reinstatement value of the goods damaged and not the depreciated value, because as per the policy, in case the insurance company is unable to reinstate or repair because of some municipal or other regulations

The Hon'ble Chhattisgarh High Court in the matter of M/s Mahendra Sponge and Power Limited v. Assistant Commissioner State Tax (W.A. No. 267 of 2022 dated January 1, 2023)quashed and set aside the order passed by the Single Judge directing the assess

The Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in Skyline Automation Industries v. State of Uttar Pradesh [Writ Tax No. - 1512 of 2022 dated January 2, 2023] quashed the demand order passed in Form DRC-07, by the Revenue Department, on the grounds that a notice in

The Applicant is a part of a global organisation dealing with renting of reusable equipments for shared use amongst industrial and retail sectors throughout the supply chain.

The Commissioner or the authorized officer may, on his own or based on submission of the assessee may examine the matter afresh. After being satisfied that the ITC availed initially considered being fraudulently or ineligible, it is no more ineligibl

The credit will not available to the extent the same is embedded in the cost of food recovered from such employees. The AAAR relied on the judgment of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court in the case of CCE Vs Ultratech Cement [2010 (260) ELT 369 (Bom)].

The Commission notes that the bid rigging is defined in explanation under Section 3(3)(d) of the Act as, any agreement, between enterprises or persons engaged in identical or similar production or trading of goods or provision of services, which has