Students Judgements
CA Exams 2021: Supreme Court's Judgement on PIL filed by CA Students
Guest 01 July 2021 at 08:59
We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Initially, multiple issues were agitated before us, but eventually, we have confined our consideration only to one aspect of making the comprehensive scheme for optout.
The appeals filed by the assessee for AY 1994-95 and 1996-97 were delayed by 2984 days. The assessee claimed that he was advised by his CAM/s Rajesh Rajeev Associatesthat since he had already filed an appeal for AY 1993-94 which was pending before th
Usha Rajkhowa and others Appellants versus M/s. Paramount In
Sumit Jain 05 March 2009 at 15:47
Uttaranchal Transport Corpn. Ltd. Appellant versus Smt. Viml
Sumit Jain 05 March 2009 at 15:46
Gopika Chandrabhushan Saran and another Appellants versus M/
Sumit Jain 05 March 2009 at 15:46
Bihari Lal Rada Appellant versus Anil Jain (Tinu) and others
Sumit Jain 05 March 2009 at 15:46
State of Haryana and others Appellants versus Narinder Kumar
Sumit Jain 05 March 2009 at 15:46
Punjab State Electricity Board and others Appellants versus
Sumit Jain 05 March 2009 at 15:46
Penalty for non-payment of Advance Tax ::
CA.Saibaburao Nanduri 07 September 2007 at 17:22
Held by hon"ble court that as the assesse had filed a revised return and paid the tax due within the time allowed u/s 148 hence,it cannot be held that assessee had made any delay in payment of tax. As such no interest u/s 234B can be levied.
CAclubindia
