This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ld CIT(A)-11, New Delhi dated 10.09.2018 for AY 2013-14.
Challenging the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - 40, Delhi (“Ld. CIT(A)”) in the case of India International Centre (“theassessee”), for the assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15, Revenue preferred these appeals on identical ground
08.01.2021: Upon proof of service of notice on Respondent, its appearance was awaited on the last date of hearing. Even today, nobody has turned up to defend the appeal on behalf of Respondent. In the given circumstances, we proceed to hear learned c
This appeal is filed by the revenue against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 3, Mumbai [hereinafter in short “Ld.CIT(A)”] dated 12.11.2018 for the A.Y. 2008-09 in restricting the addition to 5% of purchases as against t
05.01.2021 This Appeal has been filed by the Appellant-Operational Creditor against Impugned Order dated 09th September, 2020 passed in CP (IB) No. 184/BB/2020 by the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT, Bengaluru Bench). By the Impugned Order, the Adjudica
04.01.2021 Appellants are the ‘Operational Creditors’ of the Corporate Debtor - Reliance Infratel Limited. They are aggrieved of the impugned order dated 3rd December, 2020 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal, Court-I,
Since common questions of facts and law have been raisedin both the aforesaid appeals, the same are being disposed off by way of consolidated order to avoid repetition of discussion.
ITA No.1448/Bang/2017 is an appeal by the assessee, while ITA No.1660/Bang/2017 is an appeal by the revenue. Both these appeals aredirected against the order dated 12.04.2017 of the CIT(Appeals)-I, Bengaluru, relating to assessment year 2010-11.
The present application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 253/2018 registered under Sections 409/467/468/471/120B IPC at P.S. Economic Offences Wing, Delhi.
The short question involved in this appeal is, whether the acceptance of a conditional offer with a further condition results in aconcluded contract, irrespective of whether the offerer accepts thefurther condition proposed by the acceptor. This ques